Professional No-Limit Hold 'em Volume 1 Review Thread - Page 52

fraac · #**511** 08-30-2007, 04:27 PM

Ulkis, would you say that 2+2 need the services of a professional editor?

Ulkis · #**512** 08-30-2007, 05:00 PM

doesn't all publishing houses have one?

fraac · #**513** 08-30-2007, 05:08 PM

That is a highly controversial viewpoint. I'd be careful who you share that with.

ceire · #**514** 08-30-2007, 05:57 PM

bec it has for me

Ulkis · #**515** 08-30-2007, 06:05 PM

??? Usually before a book is published, someone's job is to check the draft for typos and errors. What is so controversial about that? lol

fraac · #**516** 08-30-2007, 06:18 PM

lol, you're probably right!

SenecaJim · #**517** 08-31-2007, 07:31 AM

[ QUOTE ]
doesn't all publishing houses have one?

[/ QUOTE ]

Is that the guy that would do things like change doesn't to don't ?

WarhammerIIC · #**518** 08-31-2007, 01:53 PM

[ QUOTE ]
this book is mind blowing and ground breaking and any one saying it is not is an idiot this is how strongly i feel about it (it it great for beginers and experts) the stp ratio can change you from a marginal player to a pro. I cant remember the last time i read a poker book and the thought WOW. Alot of the stuff you will know but it is said if you can get one good thing out of a book it is a good investment.

[/ QUOTE ]
Oh okay. Then I'm an idiot.

WarhammerIIC · #**519** 08-31-2007, 01:54 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I hope that for vol II authors and other people involved in making the book check for errors more carefully than for the vol I.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yes (I'll talk more about this in Vol II of my post).

larrondo · #**520** 08-31-2007, 01:55 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Ulkis, would you say that 2+2 need the services of a professional editor?

[/ QUOTE ]

I decided to keep my mouth shut this time. As usual, it's a well written book with a fair amount of errors/problems/awkwardness. Whatever. There's no use whining about it anymore.