Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #191  
Old 11-06-2007, 12:20 AM
bernie bernie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Muckleshoot! Usually rebuying.
Posts: 15,163
Default Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread

[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, actually you can forget what I said about UCLA earlier. Apparently, Cowan's got a collapsed lung, and they'll be starting a converted receiver at QB.

[/ QUOTE ]

They're not going to start that walk on 3rd stringer guy?

b
Reply With Quote
  #192  
Old 11-06-2007, 12:24 AM
bernie bernie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Muckleshoot! Usually rebuying.
Posts: 15,163
Default Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread

[ QUOTE ]
We will have to agree to disagree, but I think ASU is a fraud

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess the whole Pac 10 is a fraud this year then, isn't it?

b
Reply With Quote
  #193  
Old 11-06-2007, 03:46 AM
BobJoeJim BobJoeJim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ashland, OR
Posts: 1,450
Default Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread

If you're going to add a TD that "should" have been scored to ASU's total, you need to take away the one they scored after Oregon went into shutdown mode too, since it was in no way indicative of how the game actually played out. Oregon showed pretty clearly that at Autzen they are about 10-12 points better than ASU, in my opinion. I have trouble seeing how anyone who watched the game could disagree. At ASU it's obviously much more close, but Oregon is still at worst a 2-3 point favorite. If after watching the game you think ASU is better than 50/50 to beat the Ducks in Tempe, I don't know what to say to you. Sure it's close, but Oregon is clearly better by a bigger margin than HFA will make up.
Reply With Quote
  #194  
Old 11-06-2007, 03:57 AM
aces_dad aces_dad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 2,160
Default Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread

rwp -

While watching every snap as usual [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] it looks like if Jayson Williams had better hands Ore would have had at least 42 if not more points. Dixon looked great passing and his play actions / handoff fakes are excellent. They def went conservative with Leaf at the end after his knee scare, due in large part I felt that they were up more than 10.

Dids -

I felt Dixon would have re-entered if ASU had scored. I however don't ASU is a fraud for being ~60/40 dog to a top 3 team on a neutral field.

anyone else still reading esp Duck fans -

Sat was about as good at it gets for a Duck fan. Read the SI article about Ore and watched them jump out to an early lead, and keep it the whole game.

Obv USC owns the perennial power in Pac-10 but in a perfect year w great sr QB, great JR RB (who may leave to draft) and the best def in years it is great to compete for Pac-10 and BCS titles.

The big worry is dropped passes, I hope the coaches decide to do less long passes on 3rd and 5 type plays and look for first down type routes, to TE and other WR's who may not have the deep speed Williams has. Williams seems to do fine on the short routes as well but is having problems with the long ball. IMO he must be the best at getting open because Dixon was still looking for him a lot despite some dropped balls.
Reply With Quote
  #195  
Old 11-06-2007, 04:11 AM
21SuicideKing21 21SuicideKing21 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Are You My Caucasian?
Posts: 1,063
Default Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Oregon did look like the better team on Saturday, although that difference is 100% accounted for by home field.

[/ QUOTE ]

That is a good point.

Not that Autzen Stadium is a real tough place to play in for visitors or anything. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

I still think Oregon is the best this year but if this were at ASU the game might've been a bit different. Though I still think Oregon would've won. I don't think ASU would be over 50% at home, but it would be close.

b

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah not that intimidating, only 60k people were at the game and I was one of them!!! It helps for Oregon that there 3 big games this year were at home against USC, CAL, and ASU.
Reply With Quote
  #196  
Old 11-06-2007, 04:19 AM
BobJoeJim BobJoeJim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ashland, OR
Posts: 1,450
Default Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread

JaIson Williams has been a pass dropping machine his entire career, and it's the one thing that holds him back from being spectacular. If you could transplant Aaron Pflugrad's hands onto Williams, he would be the best wide receiver in the conference. He has great size, great speed, runs great routes, and there's a reason Dixon keeps going to him, he's too good not to throw to. Unfortunately, it's a given that he'll drop at least one, usually two or three, easy catches in any given game.
Reply With Quote
  #197  
Old 11-06-2007, 03:24 PM
bernie bernie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Muckleshoot! Usually rebuying.
Posts: 15,163
Default Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread

[ QUOTE ]
Sat was about as good at it gets for a Duck fan.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe as good as it gets, so far.

I would imagine getting to a Rose Bowl or the NC game would be as good as it gets. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

b
Reply With Quote
  #198  
Old 11-06-2007, 03:25 PM
bernie bernie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Muckleshoot! Usually rebuying.
Posts: 15,163
Default Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread

[ QUOTE ]
JaIson Williams has been a pass dropping machine his entire career, and it's the one thing that holds him back from being spectacular. If you could transplant Aaron Pflugrad's hands onto Williams, he would be the best wide receiver in the conference. He has great size, great speed, runs great routes, and there's a reason Dixon keeps going to him, he's too good not to throw to. Unfortunately, it's a given that he'll drop at least one, usually two or three, easy catches in any given game.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sounds like Marcel Reece in Ducks clothing.

b
Reply With Quote
  #199  
Old 11-06-2007, 04:27 PM
Dids Dids is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 215 lbs of fatness
Posts: 21,118
Default Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread

To be clear,

ASU is not a fraud for losing to Oregon.

They're a fraud because they should have/did in a prefect universe lost to a horrible WSU team and have zero impressive wins. The only thing close is Cal, and Cal's looking horrible.
Reply With Quote
  #200  
Old 11-06-2007, 04:29 PM
MissT74 MissT74 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kingman, Arizona
Posts: 887
Default Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread

I used to like you Dids.

T
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.