FTP greed

Johny Poker · #1 10-20-2007, 04:21 PM

Why does FTP treat loyal players so bad with their awful no rakeback if you signed up the wrong way policy??? Pure greed. I use to play a ton of cash games on FT, I am tired of being put at such a huge disadvantage. Others get 27%, I get none? [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] Time to move, all with no rakeback should do the same.

Please let me know recommended sites for middle stakes cash games with good deals. Thanks.

Mitch Evans · #2 10-20-2007, 04:43 PM

Hey Bambi, life's not fair.

Johny Poker · #3 10-20-2007, 04:44 PM

HAHAHA, touche.

EvanJC · #4 10-20-2007, 05:01 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Hey Bambi, life's not fair.

[/ QUOTE ]

This being true doesn't make FTP's stance any less exploitive

Suigin406 · #5 10-20-2007, 05:07 PM

this thread seems familiar...

admiralfluff · #6 10-20-2007, 05:09 PM

I think it would be better if all 2p2ers, with or without rb, left FTP. We should all band together to resolve this.

steel108 · #7 10-20-2007, 05:10 PM

I honestly don't think it's about greed. High MGR players who would play on FTP with rakeback don't if they can't get it. Allowing players to switch to rakeback accounts would set a bad precedent with respects to affiliates. Remember what happened on Party when people were dropping affiliates to get rakeback. It created a huge uproar and led to Party flatly saying that rakeback will no longer be allowed. You signed up through an affiliate, so that person did his job and got you to the site. They were paid already whether it was through a portion of ur rakeback or a sign up fee. Is it really fair to mandate that FTP pay another affiliate when somebody else got you to the site?

a nonymous · #8 10-20-2007, 05:20 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I honestly don't think it's about greed. High MGR players who would play on FTP with rakeback don't if they can't get it. Allowing players to switch to rakeback accounts would set a bad precedent with respects to affiliates. Remember what happened on Party when people were dropping affiliates to get rakeback. It created a huge uproar and led to Party flatly saying that rakeback will no longer be allowed. You signed up through an affiliate, so that person did his job and got you to the site. They were paid already whether it was through a portion of ur rakeback or a sign up fee. Is it really fair to mandate that FTP pay another affiliate when somebody else got you to the site?

[/ QUOTE ]
^ Someone who is actually thinking about the situation logically.

Johny Poker · #9 10-20-2007, 05:34 PM

No, they should not pay an affiliate, they should just give me the 27%.

Johny Poker · #10 10-20-2007, 05:36 PM

I couldn't agree more.