Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Which sport is more fun?
Disc Golf 20 55.56%
Ultimate 16 44.44%
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-06-2006, 03:47 AM
PokerFink PokerFink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Keyra is back
Posts: 7,209
Default PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 9)

Disclaimer: My rankings are NOT a traditional power rankings. If you are unfamiliar with how I do these, please see this post for my criteria.

Week 9 Rankings

<font color="blue">1. CHICAGO 7-1: </font>Shooting Yourself In The Foot – Take 1: For the second time in three games, Chicago managed to turn the ball over six times. Devin Hester is a nightmare for both teams returning punts; he fumbled two, including one where he inexplicably caught it at his own five yard line. Miami recovered and scored an easy touchdown, while Chicago recovered the second fumble. Meanwhile, Rex Grossman has driven his MVP bandwagon off a cliff. His statistics pretty much tell the story: 18/42 (43%), 210 Yards (5 YPA), 1TD, 3INT, 1 Fumble, 3 Sacks, 37 Rating. Chicago, after looking invincible through five games, is heading to New York with their #1 ranking up for grabs. I seriously considered dropping them this week – it’s very close. But Chicago still has the benefit of an easier schedule down the stretch. NEXT: at New York.

<font color="blue">2. NEW YORK 6-2: </font> New York is playing better right now than Chicago, and I wouldn’t be surprised at all if they win next week. Their defense has completely turned it around. Their D-Line has been getting good pressure, and we all know what happens when you pressure Grossman. Manning, like his brother, utilizes the no-huddle offense very well. New York’s game winning drive was almost exclusively no-huddle. NEXT: vs. Chicago.

<font color="blue">3. NEW ORLEANS 6-2: </font>As expected, a Saint will win the NFC offensive rookie of the year. Except it’s not Reggie Bush, it’s Marques Colston, who had a monster game (11-123-1). Drew Brees (24/32-314-3-0) continues to be the offseason’s best pickup. From the running items department, Reggie Bush continues to be terrible running the football; Bush had 11 carries for -5 yards. Yes, that's negative five yards. Bush already had the worst rushing DPAR in the NFL before this week, I can’t wait to see the DPAR on this week’s performance. NEXT: at Pittsburgh.

<font color="blue">4. ST. LOUIS 4-4: </font>Shooting Yourself In The Foot – Take 2: St. Louis racked up 452 yards against a pretty good defense today, yet scored only 17 points. How? They fumbled four times, losing three. They punted three times from Kansas City’s side of the field and had a failed 4th down conversion at the Kansas City 5 yard line after driving the length of the field. Eight penalties. Plus their defense couldn’t stop Kansas City ever, meaning poor field position all game. The good news: they still have San Fran, Arizona and Oakland and Washington on the schedule. NEXT: at Seattle.

<font color="blue">5. ATLANTA 5-3: </font>Shooting Yourself In The Foot – Take 3: Three turnovers, 9 penalties, zero defense. The good side of Michael Vick: 10 rushes, 80 yards. The bad side of Michael Vick: 17/32, 5 YPA, 2 INT, 1 Fumble, 2 Sacks. Look everyone: it’s been several years now. Vick is what we thought he was. Every once in a while he puts some good games together, but he hasn’t turned the corner and probably never will. But pin this particular loss on the defense, which allowed 435 yards to a Detroit team that is pretty mediocre offensively (19th in DVOA coming in). NEXT: vs. Cleveland.

<font color="blue">6. MINNESOTA 4-4: </font>“This is an 8-8 football team if I ever saw one.” – Me, Week 5. With their cake schedule they should still finish above .500, but that doesn’t make them any good. 238 yards and 3 points against San Francisco is inexcusable. NEXT: vs. Green Bay.

<font color="blue">7. PHILADELPHIA 4-4: </font>With Minny and Atlanta both losing to crap teams, Philly’s wildcard hopes improved dramatically. Can they pull a New York and use the bye week to turn things around? I hope so. Home games against Washington and Tennessee could jump-start a run down the stretch. By the way, I’ll be at the Linc on Sunday, anyone else going? NEXT: vs. Washington.

<font color="blue">8. SEATTLE 4-3: </font>How will Seneca Wallace fare against an Oakland defense that is actually pretty average? Can Oakland really win three games in a row? Looking ahead, the pending returns of Alexander and Hasselbeck will do little to improve the defense, which has been surprisingly poor this year, ranking 24th in DVOA. If St. Louis can tear apart Kansas City’s defense (ranked 9th coming into this week), they should move the ball against Seattle as well. Just like New York, their ranking really depends on next week’s game, and I’m still taking St. Louis. NEXT: vs. St. Louis

<font color="blue">9. DALLAS 4-4: </font>Shooting Yourself In The Foot – Take 4: Dallas committed 11 penalties for a mind boggling 153 yards. Owens dropped passes, as usual. Vanderjagt missed a big field goal, as usual. A week after potentially salvaging their season in Carolina, Dallas just blew this one. With their remaining schedule, they’re pretty much toast. On the plus side, Romo (24/36-284-2-0) continues to play well. NEXT: at Arizona.

<font color="blue">10. CAROLINA 4-4: </font>While we’re talking defensive MVP’s in the awards thread, Julius Peppers and his 8 sacks (3rd in NFL) and 3 forced fumbles (4th) says hello. NEXT: vs. Tampa Bay.

<font color="blue">11. GREEN BAY 3-5: </font>Ahman Green sighting: 24 touches, 130 yards. They outgained Buffalo by 243 yards but Favre threw a pair of picks (one returned for a score) and fumbled two snaps. I’ll be honest – I’m a little happy they lost so we don’t have to hear the Brett Favre rejuvenation stories all week long. Now do me and my wallet a favor and beat Minny, thanks. NEXT: at Minnesota.

<font color="blue">12. WASHINGTON 3-5: </font>I often rip on the “old-school” coaches for their passive play calling. Well, major kudos to Joe Gibbs for going for it on 4th and goal from the 1 yard line early in the game. Portis got stuffed, but they turned around and recorded a safety on the next play, which is better than a field goal anyway. If that’s not an advertisement for going for it, I don’t know what is. NEXT: at Philadelphia.

<font color="blue">13. SAN FRANSISCO 3-5 (Up 1): </font>Our first movers of the week. I guess San Fran watched film of Oakland and Tampa’s recent victories, as the Niners won despite gaining well under 200 yards on offense. NEXT: at Detroit.

<font color="blue">14. TAMPA BAY 2-6 (Down 1): </font>What happened to Cadillac Williams? 12 carries, 39 yards. He’s averaging only 3.7 yards per carry for the year. Tampa completely shut down Reggie Bush, but apparently forgot that New Orleans has some other weapons. NEXT: at Carolina.

<font color="blue">15. DETROIT 2-6 (Up 1): </font>Out of the basement! Woohoo! I’m curious what this team will do with Kitna. He’s played decently this year, and this team has needs other than QB that they must address in the draft. But he will be 35 next season and they have to draft a franchise QB eventually. NEXT: vs. San Francisco.

<font color="blue">16. ARIZONA 1-7 (Down 1): </font>Remember when this team was 1-0? Ouch. NEXT: vs. Dallas.

Commentary

I’ve never seen as many teams shoot themselves in the foot as I did this week. I watched WAS-DAL in the early game, and DAL completely blew it with the penalties/drops. I watched PIT-DEN in the 4pm game, and Pittsburgh completely blew it with the fumbles. (By the way, at one point I yelled "It's a fuuuumble" Berman Style as Santonio Holmes fielded a punt - and sure enough he fumbled about four seconds later. Good times.) And then New England played like crap tonight. If I’m going to spend 10 hours watching football, can I just see one well-played game? Please? Is that too much to ask?

If you’re wondering, here are my traditional power rankings of who I think would beat who on a neutral field right now:

1) NYG
2) CHI
3) NO
4) PHI
5) DAL
6) ATL
7) STL
8) MIN
9) SEA
10) CAR
11) WAS
12) GB
13) TB
14) SF
15) DET
16) ARZ
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-06-2006, 03:50 AM
PokerFink PokerFink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Keyra is back
Posts: 7,209
Default Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 9)

Poll Time.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-06-2006, 03:52 AM
lastchance lastchance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Don\'t edit my location
Posts: 22,856
Default Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 9)

I think Philly beats NO on a neutral field.

I have the Giants in Giants-Bears, solely because of HFA. I have Seattle in Rams-Hawks, because homerism is awesome, and because of HFA.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-06-2006, 04:00 AM
PokerFink PokerFink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Keyra is back
Posts: 7,209
Default Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 9)

[ QUOTE ]
I think Philly beats NO on a neutral field.

[/ QUOTE ]

Before the JAX game, I would have agreed with you. Philly's early season form is better than New Orleans. But there is a very real chance that Philly is turning into a head case and will fall apart. I'll take a confident Saints team over an Eagles team that may be psychological mess right now.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-06-2006, 04:13 AM
Triumph36 Triumph36 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Osi Ukin\'-yora
Posts: 9,388
Default Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 9)

PF -

Unfortunately, the Giants looked like absolute garbage this week against Houston - if you had a chance to see the game (which I doubt, you probably got Dallas-Washington) you'd've seen that Houston was probably the better team, but consistently hurt themselves with dropped passes and stupid penalties as well as stalling in the red zone. The Giants were lucky to escape this week with a win - and if both Strahan and Umenyiora are out, Grossman will make quick work of the Giants' secondary. The Giants' ends in this game were Kiwanuka and Adrian Awasom - they're seriously beat up all over the defense, and it will show against a good team.

That said, I'm still excited for next week's game.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-06-2006, 04:28 AM
PokerFink PokerFink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Keyra is back
Posts: 7,209
Default Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 9)

[ QUOTE ]
if you had a chance to see the game (which I doubt, you probably got Dallas-Washington)

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah I got the Dallas game. I need DirecTV like woah. Next year, when I have my own place. Atleast the game I got was exciting, albeit sloppy. But I digress...

[ QUOTE ]
you'd've seen that Houston was probably the better team, but consistently hurt themselves with dropped passes and stupid penalties as well as stalling in the red zone.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah that sounds like Houston =). Anyway, the stats make it look pretty close. New York narrowly outgained Houston. Obviously it wasn't an impressive victory, but I've been very impressed with New York's play overall since their bye week. New York played mediocre today, but Chicago has played like utter crap in two of their last three games.

[ QUOTE ]
and if both Strahan and Umenyiora are out, Grossman will make quick work of the Giants' secondary.

[/ QUOTE ]

I knew that Umenyiora was out, but I wasn't aware that Strahan got hurt this week. I missed that somehow. The Giants secondary is pretty bad, so I agree that Grossman will do well if the Giants can't get any pressure.

I was surprised that New York only sacked Carr once, with the Strahan injury it makes sense.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-06-2006, 04:36 AM
Semtex Semtex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: LA
Posts: 1,539
Default Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 9)

[ QUOTE ]
I knew that Umenyiora was out, but I wasn't aware that Strahan got hurt this week.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah he rolled his foot but xrays were negative so i doubt he's benched.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-06-2006, 04:51 AM
Semtex Semtex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: LA
Posts: 1,539
Default Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 9)

I think Giants-Bears game is dependent on which Bears offense comes to play. There is the pound teams into the ground/record the highest point differentials in recent history offense. If they show up New York is going to feel like they were back in Seattle (which is funny b/c that offense destroyed the Seahawks as well). Then of course there is the totally inept version which we've seen in a couple games. Basically, the Giants have no control over their destiny this weekend.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-06-2006, 09:28 AM
capone0 capone0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,906
Default Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 9)

AFC:

1. Colts



2. Broncos
3. Patriots
4. Ravens
5. Chargers
6. KC
7. Jacksonville
8. Cincy
9. Jets
10. Buffalo
11. Pittsburgh
12. Miami
13. Cleveland
14. Tennessee
15. Houston
16. Oakland
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-06-2006, 10:25 AM
SoloAJ SoloAJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Illinois State
Posts: 3,942
Default Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 9)

[ QUOTE ]
AFC:

1. Colts



2. Broncos
3. Patriots
4. Ravens
5. Chargers
6. KC
7. Jacksonville
8. Cincy
9. Jets
10. Buffalo
11. Pittsburgh
12. Miami
13. Cleveland
14. Tennessee
15. Houston
16. Oakland

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you seriously misused the spacebar here buddy. If you're going to rank the Colts with a bunch of spaces...you probably should have spaced throughout at other gaps. Quit trying to be fancy.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.