Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-15-2007, 11:49 PM
RandomUser RandomUser is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 678
Default Should balls and strikes be called electronically?

I am really getting tired of having umpires unduly influence the outcome of games.

Case in point tonight was when Manny took a 3-0 pitch that was 9+ inches off the plate and was called a strike. Instead of having the bases loaded and nobody out, he ends up hitting into a double play.

It is ridiculous to tell batters/pitchers that they have to adjust to the umpire. A strike should be a strike regardless of who is calling it.

When the umpire expands the strike zone, it forces batters to start swinging at bad pitches rather than being called out on strikes.

We have the technology available to instantly determine whether or not a ball is in the strike zone. So why don't we use it?

You can talk 'spirit of the game' and 'tradition' all you want, but all you are doing is arguing that bad calls should remain a part of the game when we have the ability to remove them.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-15-2007, 11:52 PM
lastchance lastchance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Don\'t edit my location
Posts: 22,856
Default Re: Should balls and strikes be called electronically?

Yes. As long as the tech works.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-16-2007, 12:38 AM
Jurollo Jurollo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,764
Default Re: Should balls and strikes be called electronically?

the strike zone is such an imperfect science I don't think technology would ever really be able to take over.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-16-2007, 12:39 AM
leehrat leehrat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,706
Default Re: Should balls and strikes be called electronically?

don't the umpires have a union? i think there are a lot of factors (politics, tradition, etc.) present in baseball that might rule this out.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-16-2007, 12:44 AM
Salva135 Salva135 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 253
Default Re: Should balls and strikes be called electronically?

What got me thinking about this for the 1st time tonight was the use of the camera at the Jake that the announcers claimed was used in order to help "standardize" the strike zone across the Major Leagues. The question immediately struck me - if you really want to standardize the strike zone, then you're talking about eliminating human error, which essentially leads you to an argument for robotic strike zones, and ultimately for automation of all umpire duties.

Baseball being the most form-functional of the major sports, I don't see this movement carrying to football or basketball. At least not in my lifetime.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-16-2007, 12:49 AM
Rubeskies Rubeskies is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Searching for I.C.Weiner
Posts: 2,469
Default Re: Should balls and strikes be called electronically?

If you computerize it, which strike zone do you use?

The one in the book which is knees to letters or the one currently in use today which is knees to belt?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-16-2007, 01:28 AM
ADLinden ADLinden is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Thanking Oklahoma and Pitt.
Posts: 1,852
Default Re: Should balls and strikes be called electronically?

[ QUOTE ]
the strike zone is such an imperfect science I don't think technology would ever really be able to take over.

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-16-2007, 01:04 AM
MyTurn2Raise MyTurn2Raise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Evolving Day-By-Day
Posts: 18,508
Default Re: Should balls and strikes be called electronically?

[ QUOTE ]
Yes. As long as the tech works.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-15-2007, 11:52 PM
jstnrgrs jstnrgrs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,840
Default Re: Should balls and strikes be called electronically?

Yes
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-16-2007, 12:34 AM
Scary_Tiger Scary_Tiger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,590
Default Re: Should balls and strikes be called electronically?

[ QUOTE ]
Yes

[/ QUOTE ]

I think just giving the umpire a vibrating strike caller would be fine, so he'd still look like he's calling them.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.