|
|
#1
11-01-2007, 03:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Rakeback question for math nuts.
Assume the following:
1) exact same rake structure at both sites 2) site A pays 30% rakeback and uses the "player contribution" method 3) site B pays 27% rakeback and uses the "dealt cards" method 4) both sites avg. 5.6 players per hand and 45% players to the flop 5) my play is VPIP/PFR of 26/17 and I go to SD about 33%. given all of that, is it possible to compute which rakeback deal is more lucrative?? 
|
|
#3
11-01-2007, 04:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Rakeback question for math nuts.
what is site b?
|
|
#5
11-01-2007, 04:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Rakeback question for math nuts.
[ QUOTE ]
A is absolute B is Full Tilt [/ QUOTE ] I know nothing about Absilute rakeback, but perhaps you need to factor in the fees asscoated with cashing out from FullTilt.
|
|
#6
11-01-2007, 06:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Rakeback question for math nuts.
also absolute has nonstop bonus?
|
|
#7
11-01-2007, 06:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Rakeback question for math nuts.
Both sites have plenty of donks. AP has a $500 deposit bonus but has TONS of reload bonuses, FTP has $600. AP doesnt deduct your bonus from your rakeback, FTP does. AP has 30% RB and FTP only has 27%. But in light of all the potripper stuff thats been going on I would put my $ on FTP > AP anyday. I play on stars because supernova is like 30% rakeback and they have awesome customer support and the most games. But as far as the best site to play on I would say AP but the most trustworthy out of the two would be FTP. It all just depends on how safe you feel with AP.
|
|
#8
11-01-2007, 08:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Rakeback question for math nuts.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] A is absolute B is Full Tilt [/ QUOTE ] I know nothing about Absilute rakeback, but perhaps you need to factor in the costs asscoated with villain seeing your cards . [/ QUOTE ] I've never played at either, but I believe Absoulte's bonus is pretty constsant and isn't deducted from your MGR. This should be much more profitable.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
