Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Limit-->NL
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-01-2007, 11:04 PM
admiralfluff admiralfluff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,742
Default Re: Super standard calldown in limit

I've seen him limp/call preflop, and bet pot on flop OoP HU 4-5 times in a few orbits. Of the 2 times the other person just called, he overbet the turn.

I agree with everything in your post, and yes, the real question is: "What is the most reasonable approximation of this players actual strategy given what we know about the NL population (which is zilch for me, hence the thread) and this retardation-biased sample?"
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-02-2007, 05:11 AM
DeathDonkey DeathDonkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DeucesCracked - Serious Game
Posts: 6,426
Default Re: Super standard calldown in limit

The point is what if our hand was 22 instead of JJ? If raise/folding the flop is more +EV compared to folding right away (EV of 0) than raising with JJ is clearly better than folding too.

-DeathDonkey
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-02-2007, 06:06 AM
BigPoppa BigPoppa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mid-Life Crisis
Posts: 3,614
Default Re: Super standard calldown in limit

[ QUOTE ]
The point is what if our hand was 22 instead of JJ? If raise/folding the flop is more +EV compared to folding right away (EV of 0) than raising with JJ is clearly better than folding too.

-DeathDonkey

[/ QUOTE ]

Raise/folding is a terrible idea given stack sizes. Raising at all is a bad idea given that all better hands call and all worse hands fold.

JJ has much better showdown value than 22. If Villain is bluffing with 3rd pair, he still beats our 22 but not our JJ. If Villain doesn't have an Ace, then JJ is almost always good. So we let him keep the lead if we decide to stay in. The only real value we're getting is if he decides to bluff off his stack with an underpair/air, and raising gets him to shut down.

If I was holding 22 and decide to stay in, then I shove the flop as a stone bluff. That folds out all his crap hands that might inadvertently beat us and only an Ace calls. Some Villains might lay down a bad Ace, but not this guy (which is why I'm not shoving the flop here).

In fact, given OP's read and stack sizes, I am not raising anything on this flop. Not AK, not a set, nothing. Villain is likely to shove the Turn and that seems a much better way of getting money into the pot than raising.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-02-2007, 06:21 AM
BigPoppa BigPoppa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mid-Life Crisis
Posts: 3,614
Default Re: Super standard calldown in limit

[ QUOTE ]
I agree with everything in your post, and yes, the real question is: "What is the most reasonable approximation of this players actual strategy given what we know about the NL population (which is zilch for me, hence the thread) and this retardation-biased sample?"

[/ QUOTE ]

There's a theorum (Aejones Theorum?) that goes "Nobody ever has anything". I think this guy, in his own idiot way, is operating on that Theorum.

He figures that most players, even ones who raised preflop, don't want to call a PSB on the flop and turn on most boards. So he just donk bets into them and takes the pot away.

If this guy ever shows down a hand, you'll get a much better idea of what he's doing this with. Without a showdown, I can't really guess his range; but it includes crap aces, underpairs, and air. Just not sure what the proportions are.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.