hockey fans: who's better?

[Triumph36]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


Basically, Lecavalier is better at accumulating points (better player), but Thornton is better at making the players around him better (most valuable player).

[/ QUOTE ]

Guys, this is basically my only point. If what was said above is true, then Thornton would be the better player, not Vinny.

[/ QUOTE ]

A link for you, Thayer:

not a rickroll

[BowToYourSensei]

thayer:

steve nash could theoretically make a case to win mvp every year for the rest of his career because without him the suns are lost. is he the best player in the league? not even close.

i await your flaming

[THAY3R]

The Steve Nash debate has happened on 2p2 over and over again. Steve Nash is not the most valuable player, and it's not very close.(Maybe the most valuable point guard)

[BowToYourSensei]

shrug, you just wanted someone to use one example, i used mine.

[mason55]

THAY3R -

What if one guy is a player-coach?! Then he could be more valuable without being a better player!!!


FKKKING BRILLIANT

[Pudge714]

Since you aren't qualifying best.
I'm going to assume best= most valuable.
If you think best is most talented or something else than say that.