USA Today article - Neteller - Page 2

TomR · #1 02-02-2007, 01:20 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So i am not a finance major but where are netellers funds? And how did they seize them again?

[/ QUOTE ]

most are probably illiquid right now and laddered in investments

[/ QUOTE ]

Please give some basis for this assertion. Hint, you might want to first read their financial statements:

http://investors.neteller.com/netell...AL11sep062.pdf

PartyPooperGuy · #2 02-02-2007, 12:58 AM

lol, donkaments.

I mean, OH [censored]. [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]

teddyFBI · #3 02-02-2007, 12:59 AM

My high school newsletter had higher reporting standards than USAToday.

This is a non-event.
(but cue the inevitable adolescent hysterics anyway)

PartyPooperGuy · #4 02-02-2007, 01:02 AM

[ QUOTE ]
My high school newsletter had higher reporting standards than USAToday.

This is a non-event.
(but cue the inevitable adolescent hysterics anyway)

[/ QUOTE ]

WTF do USA Today's standards have to do with this? THEY QUOTED AN FBI AGENT. Are you telling me this is not significant news, particularly to those of us with substantial funds stuck in Neteller?

PokerBonusWhore · #5 02-02-2007, 12:59 AM

This has gone WAY to far than I ever thought...

manguydude21 · #6 02-02-2007, 01:01 AM

[ QUOTE ]
This has gone WAY to far than I ever thought...

[/ QUOTE ]

hmm??

Barrin6 · #7 02-02-2007, 01:09 AM

[ QUOTE ]
This has gone WAY to far than I ever thought...

[/ QUOTE ]

monkeyman · #8 02-02-2007, 01:00 AM

atleast people can stop blaming neteller now.

HeavilyArmed · #9 02-02-2007, 07:42 PM

[ QUOTE ]
atleast people can stop blaming neteller now.

[/ QUOTE ]

But when will they start blaming themselves? I just can't believe the trust these folks have shown in unregulated offshore question marks.

kack1969 · #10 02-02-2007, 07:52 PM

what would be considered a taxable ammount? Is it different for each state in the US? my ammount were mostly small 300 500 stuff like that