|
|
|
|
#1
10-16-2007, 04:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
4-way CB with 56s wheeeee
Comments on all streets appreciated.
Full Tilt Poker, $1/$2 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players LegoPoker Hand History Converter MP: $209.20 CO: $56.20 Hero (BTN): $222.30 SB: $65.75 BB: $210.30 UTG: $300.65 Pre-Flop: 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (BTN) UTG calls $2, 2 folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $10</font>, SB calls $9, BB calls $8, UTG calls $8 Flop: ($40) 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (4 Players) SB checks, BB checks, UTG checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $30</font>, 2 folds, <font color="red">UTG raises to $84</font>, Hero calls $54 Turn: ($208) 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">UTG bets $90</font>, Hero folds The thing is...if I hit the turn, I get paid off enough to make the flop call ok. But, I'm in RIO territory when he has a set with redraws, which I'm guessing he has ALOT. 
|
|
#3
10-16-2007, 04:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 4-way CB with 56s wheeeee
[ QUOTE ]
You have to stack him like every time for this to be profitable. Might be good for metagame, though! [/ QUOTE ] I think I do stack him every time I hit. But, I think I get restacked on some rivers too. PF and CB comments also welcome...
|
|
#5
10-16-2007, 04:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 4-way CB with 56s wheeeee
[ QUOTE ]
I'd like to hear your thoughts on why you bet instead of checked? Not saying it's wrong just curious what your reasoning was. [/ QUOTE ] Well, with that flop I decide to rep a big pair with the CB. I don't think anyone is going to think I am messing around with it being 4-way and I should fold out all pairs 88, 7x, and lower. I think I have a decent chance to take it down on the flop. Plus, it gets me to the river for free usually if I get flat called.
|
|
#7
10-16-2007, 04:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 4-way CB with 56s wheeeee
I think the CBet is fine, mostly because I think your bet just gets flatted a ton of the time, didn't this time. Meh.
I can see some good arguments for checking, though. You MIGHT try betting less... but I think it'll get you in trouble here, since you don't really wanna deal with c/r bluffs in this spot. Might be sexy HU though.
|
|
#8
10-16-2007, 05:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 4-way CB with 56s wheeeee
[ QUOTE ]
You have to stack him like every time for this to be profitable. [/ QUOTE ] I think my rule-of-thumb maths must be wrong. I thought that we are nearly getting direct odds and that we don't need much in implied to make that up.
|
|
#9
10-16-2007, 02:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 4-way CB with 56s wheeeee
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] You have to stack him like every time for this to be profitable. [/ QUOTE ] I think my rule-of-thumb maths must be wrong. I thought that we are nearly getting direct odds and that we don't need much in implied to make that up. [/ QUOTE ] We're getting 5.2:1 implied, and we're only 4.9:1 to hit our draw on the next card.
|
|
#10
10-16-2007, 02:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 4-way CB with 56s wheeeee
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] You have to stack him like every time for this to be profitable. [/ QUOTE ] I think my rule-of-thumb maths must be wrong. I thought that we are nearly getting direct odds and that we don't need much in implied to make that up. [/ QUOTE ] We're getting 5.2:1 implied, and we're only 4.9:1 to hit our draw on the next card. [/ QUOTE ] If these are the odds we need to fold the flop even if we get him all-in on the turn 100% when we hit.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
