|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: 10k Monitor fight yo??!??!!!!!??!!!111??!!! | |||
| Dell, obv |
   
|
5 | 9.09% |
| Lizard, obv |
  
|
12 | 21.82% |
| Monitor on Monitor action is HAWT |
  
|
8 | 14.55% |
| This may be the most retarded thing I've ever seen on 2p2. Ever. |
  
|
17 | 30.91% |
| BASTARD |
  
|
13 | 23.64% |
| Voters: 55. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#8
11-14-2007, 02:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bling survey for engaged/married OOTers
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] $13,000 + $3500 / $700 = 23.5 [/ QUOTE ] Big rock or super-high quality? [/ QUOTE ] I guess it depends on your definition of each. It's like 1.7 carats, colorless (D or E), VVS1. You can really tell the difference if you put it next to a more included or less colorless diamond. It catches the light like you wouldn't believe. [/ QUOTE ] um, where do you get a 1.7carat D/E VVS1 for 13000? That sounds outlandish [/ QUOTE ] Not if you realize the cut is subpar (or the papers are faked). From the quoted light catching comment, it is clear that the poster does not understand what he is talking about. Cut is what matters for that effect, inclusions mean dick there. [ QUOTE ] OK, I was slightly off. 1.71 carats, E, VS2. [/ QUOTE ] Fake papers and [censored] cut FTW and me for the poor reading comprehension. J 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode