#1
|
|||
|
|||
Non standard set line
Villain is p0ck3tp3ar, we used to tangle at limit 100/200. He is multitabling many tables with me and seems to be playing well 23/10 full game. Very aggressive. I think I probably f-ed this hand up by not 3 betting flop, opening the door for him to push big draws and to stack him on later streets if he just calls. I usually just try to get more money in asap but opted not to this time. What'cha think?
*Note we are close to 200 bb deep. PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $6 BB (8 handed) pokerhand.org hand converter BB ($55) UTG ($560.35) UTG+1 ($1189.80) MP1 ($3133.65) MP2 ($592.20) CO ($520) Hero ($1072.05) SB ($1158.45) Preflop: Hero is Button with 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">4 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises to $24</font>, Hero calls $24, SB calls $21, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>. Flop: ($78) 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> SB checks, CO checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $65</font>, <font color="#CC3333">SB raises to $184</font>, CO folds, Hero calls $119. Turn: ($446) T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> SB checks, Hero checks. River: ($446) 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $350</font>, |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Non standard set line
Yah, 3betting flop is good play. I bet the turn here usually, you shouldn't have a ten too often given action.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Non standard set line
i bet the turn to extract value from a possible flush draw. Something that he'll call for sure though, like $240 ish
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Non standard set line
i think it looks exactly like hero has a ten, and it pairing gives villain a reason to dump overpair fearing 2 more bets coming, but will pay off a river bet if turn checks
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Non standard set line
[ QUOTE ]
i bet the turn to extract value from a possible flush draw. Something that he'll call for sure though, like $240 ish [/ QUOTE ] I didn't think a good player would even call a half pot turn with a flush draw since the board paired. If you were in opponents spot with like AJ spades, what would u do on turn if I bet 250? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Non standard set line
Meh, on further review I kinda like turn check, his hand really looks like a draw here.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Non standard set line
Underbetting is transparent, but still not terrible IMO.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Non standard set line
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i bet the turn to extract value from a possible flush draw. Something that he'll call for sure though, like $240 ish [/ QUOTE ] I didn't think a good player would even call a half pot turn with a flush draw since the board paired. If you were in opponents spot with like AJ spades, what would u do on turn if I bet 250? [/ QUOTE ] agreed, its fishy. But i still think its the most +ev. I think villain will make a mistake of calling with a flush draw VERY often. Not only that, but it also builds the pot if villian is slowplaying the ten. Transparent? Probably. Highest ev? I think so. |
|
|