New Software SpadeEye: Tableselection (@PP) - Page 76

Mr_Snood · #**751** 11-05-2007, 07:03 PM

1) Will be added.

2) Will be added, too [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Mr_Snood · #**752** 11-05-2007, 07:06 PM

I would love this feature too, but how to realize that?

A player can leave the waitinglist, or get kicked off the list and SpadeEye will not be able to notice this.
Or what if you got the seat?
Again SpadeEye does not know that you got the seat or rejected it...

So it's a big hassle to realize it reliably.

omaha · #**753** 11-06-2007, 06:19 AM

Many thanks for ignoring my idea about having three buddy lists. I think the idea about rankings and points was a whole heap better.

Am thinking about searching db and setting up say 10rules RE pfr, vpip and af, and using the -bb/100 hands as the points. Then use the buddy list as the tags, ie vp10-20%,pfr>10

Then, i can see how many whales fish and sharks are on the table.

Anyone got any thoughts on this idea?

ForStepper · #**754** 11-06-2007, 09:25 AM

When the 'mailing list' feature is going to come? Thanks again.

yellowbluebus · #**755** 11-06-2007, 10:44 AM

Anyone mind sharing their scoring system that's working for them?

thac · #**756** 11-06-2007, 11:01 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Anyone mind sharing their scoring system that's working for them?

[/ QUOTE ]

I have a really simple one of 1 point for VPIP 30+, 1 point for PFR 0-10, and 1 point for stack size 75bb+, I'm certain it's not the best though.

c_stop · #**757** 11-07-2007, 12:16 AM

I apologize if this has been asked before-

Am I able to use Spadeeye on two different computers if I pay my $40? Thanks in advance.

Mr_Snood · #**758** 11-07-2007, 12:51 AM

[ QUOTE ]

Am I able to use Spadeeye on two different computers if I pay my $40? Thanks in advance.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yes. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

HighSteaks · #**759** 11-07-2007, 01:06 AM

Mr Snood,

I think the amount of hands a player has played needs to be taken into acount for the scoring system. The Stacksizes criteria should be eliminated as that is addressed in the shortstack column, and a blanket rule of "number of hands to qualify a player" needs to be added. This could be entered manually or set as a default of 50 if it is a problem. Looks like being a great feature, I've tried this so far-

Mr_Snood · #**760** 11-07-2007, 01:57 AM

I am currently not sure what i coded last 2 weeks when starting to implement the scoring system, but i think a player gets only scored if you have a minimum amount of hands from him in your database(s).
You can set this minimum amount under "main"->"options"->"profile".

I think the Stacksize criteria should not be removed.
Some people like to give shortstack players a negative score. Thats easier than taking a look in the "#Shortstacks" column...