|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: no more value to be had i guess
wait, so you are agreeing with me right? bc i was agreeing with you.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: no more value to be had i guess
[ QUOTE ]
wait, so you are agreeing with me right? bc i was agreeing with you. [/ QUOTE ] yes, luego made it sound like it was standard to 3-bet KK, AA, and KQ here, with these stacks and this situation. i'm saying that i'm pretty rarely 3-betting any of thsoe hands, and it would be my satndard to call, and i guess i'd be considered a 2p2 tag type. so yea. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: no more value to be had i guess
I think that from villain's POV pretty much everything got there if he has AT/KJ (or whatever other hand you beat) so I can't really see him looking you up too light. However, I'm pretty bad at thin value.
If you bet are you calling a raise? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: no more value to be had i guess
well one thing that has to be considered is that, believe it or not ae, i checkraise a pretty absurd amount of flops at times. so i think not 3betting AA/KK/QQ/KQ here would be giving up a lot i think since i am def stacking off with AJ here. im guessing he could be checking behind QJ on turn sometimes tho. i dont know. i think its its close either way.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: no more value to be had i guess
[ QUOTE ]
well one thing that has to be considered is that, believe it or not ae, i checkraise a pretty absurd amount of flops at times. so i think not 3betting AA/KK/QQ/KQ here would be giving up a lot i think since i am def stacking off with AJ here. im guessing he could be checking behind QJ on turn sometimes tho. i dont know. i think its its close either way. [/ QUOTE ] you CR an absurd amount of flops so he shoul dbe 3-betting more? thats not how i see it, and without a lot of history, i woudl be calling here with KK + |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: no more value to be had i guess
Don't know about you guys, but whenever I fire my 87 here on river I get fkin SNAPCALLED by all fkin jacks and tens, so I would VB.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: no more value to be had i guess
yeah def bet. why is everyone assuming he's good enough to know op prob won't bluff here. You'll get looked up loads
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: no more value to be had i guess
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] well one thing that has to be considered is that, believe it or not ae, i checkraise a pretty absurd amount of flops at times. so i think not 3betting AA/KK/QQ/KQ here would be giving up a lot i think since i am def stacking off with AJ here. im guessing he could be checking behind QJ on turn sometimes tho. i dont know. i think its its close either way. [/ QUOTE ] you CR an absurd amount of flops so he shoul dbe 3-betting more? thats not how i see it, and without a lot of history, i woudl be calling here with KK + [/ QUOTE ] well ppl are retarded like johan implied. and ofc he should def be 3-betting wider if i c/r a bunch. going into calldownmode to defend wouldnt be very optimal i dont think. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: no more value to be had i guess
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] well one thing that has to be considered is that, believe it or not ae, i checkraise a pretty absurd amount of flops at times. so i think not 3betting AA/KK/QQ/KQ here would be giving up a lot i think since i am def stacking off with AJ here. im guessing he could be checking behind QJ on turn sometimes tho. i dont know. i think its its close either way. [/ QUOTE ] you CR an absurd amount of flops so he shoul dbe 3-betting more? thats not how i see it, and without a lot of history, i woudl be calling here with KK + [/ QUOTE ] well ppl are retarded like johan implied. and ofc he should def be 3-betting wider if i c/r a bunch. going into calldownmode to defend wouldnt be very optimal i dont think. [/ QUOTE ] my thoughts are that it's a bluff often, ass i assume since you don't often have hands you want to CR and stack off with. if it's a bluff often, he makes his hand look like two sevens by flatting, and he gets the 280 second barrel |
|
|