|
View Poll Results: Which QB? | |||
Matt Hasselbeck (Seneca Wallace) at Broncos | 4 | 33.33% | |
Chad Pennington at Packers | 8 | 66.67% | |
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What are you more likely to do? *Poll*
I'd call knowing I should have folded.
There's nothing he plays like this that we beat. Whatever he has he played very passively, be it pp, T or fd. On the river suddenly he is no longer passive. Pretty easy to guess which one of the 3 it is. Call and hope he's tilting after yet another fd bricks. *edit* With new poll I now fold. Unless of course he knew my call button was broken. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What are you more likely to do? *Poll*
His low AF + high WTSD means im strongly debating between a 3-bet and a call.. but would lean toward a call.
If his AF was any higher, I insta 3-bet...(And this is to the first poll) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What are you more likely to do? *Poll*
if the guy is competent at all, why would he now decide to raise 77-99? if a player wanted to put in more bets than call/call/call, why would he wait until the 3-bettor's range is narrowed strongly toward overpairs? it makes no sense at all.
some people are saying "he might have JJ." oh, really? so he just called preflop, got a great flop/turn and just called? people are saying "he didn't raise flop so he doesn't have Tx." hahaha. he's a (likely multi-tabling) tag 2 off the button and T9s/JT/QT/KT very often just call every street postflop. these hands should really not be discounted much at all based on the flop and turn. and then when he raises the river, bayes it up sir. waiting to raise the river with 77-99/JJ here is amazingly uncommon. please show me a hand where a guy with reasonable stats did something like that. i doubt you remember one you played recently, because it doesn't happen. however, i bet you can remember a guy calling you down with JT flop+turn+river (river blank) in this hand when you have 99 in the SB. i can't believe you people. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What are you more likely to do? *Poll*
[ QUOTE ]
if the guy is competent at all, why would he now decide to raise 77-99? if a player wanted to put in more bets than call/call/call, why would he wait until the 3-bettor's range is narrowed strongly toward overpairs? it makes no sense at all. [/ QUOTE ] The I-need-to-raise-somewhere-but-can't-fold-to-a-turn-3bet line? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What are you more likely to do? *Poll*
[ QUOTE ]
The I-need-to-raise-somewhere-but-can't-fold-to-a-turn-3bet-so-I'll-raise-without-an-edge line? [/ QUOTE ] i like this line and use it often. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What are you more likely to do? *Poll*
[ QUOTE ]
some people are saying "he might have JJ." oh, really? so he just called preflop, got a great flop/turn and just called? [/ QUOTE ] lol. I didnt mean there a realistic chance of him JJ. I listed it because I meant "All PP that are under QQ and didnt flop a set." I jsut put that as part of other hands that might do this becuase there is always the off chance someone does something REALLY stupid. We've all seen someone play a over pair completly moronic once. But how often does he show up with a T here? He should be playing a T almost exactly like he plays JJ, but we're supposed to beleive he rivered trips? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What are you more likely to do? *Poll*
[ QUOTE ]
He should be playing a T almost exactly like he plays JJ, but we're supposed to beleive he rivered trips? [/ QUOTE ] preflop dude, c'mon. also you're acting like i'm suggesting folding in the first poll. i'm not. my issue is with anyone saying "easy 3-bet" or "insta 3-bet" with such small qualifiers as "if his AF were higher," "if he were a Party regular," or "but you guys know this limit better." this stuff just rubs my anus the wrong way. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What are you more likely to do? *Poll*
lol. Honestly, I'd mean a realistic chance of JJ and havent argued that it wa a likely holding. I list all mid PP's not including the T. If it makes that big a deal I'll edit it out.
I think its just as unlikely he plays a T like this though as you think he plays JJ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What are you more likely to do? *Poll*
[ QUOTE ]
my issue is with anyone saying "easy 3-bet" or "insta 3-bet" with such small qualifiers as "if his AF were higher," "if he were a Party regular," or "but you guys know this limit better." this stuff just rubs my anus the wrong way. [/ QUOTE ] I agree with everything Miles has said in this thread except I dont think it's possible to have one's anus rubbed the wrong way. |
|
|