|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Does this poll add value? | |||
| STANFORD SUCKS |
   
|
5 | 33.33% |
| YSSCKY |
  
|
5 | 33.33% |
| XXX |
  
|
5 | 33.33% |
| Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#2
10-20-2007, 05:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: defending vs squeeze: options, options..
call and play back on flop seems like the best the options in your poll. unsure if its better than folding though. AT sucks, even though its sooted.
4-betting in this spot works if villain is of the sort to pull back a bit when he encounters something strange, and will probably read it for strength. If he's stubbornly overaggro and will just shove anything, then dont do that. Obv if you 4-bet either way, you need to fold to a shove. 
|
|
#3
10-20-2007, 05:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: defending vs squeeze: options, options..
in terms of showing strength:
shove > call and showing strength on flop > 4betting as for which i'd do, i wouldn't call pf, but given you have, i'd probs shove for meta.
|
|
#4
10-22-2007, 03:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: defending vs squeeze: options, options..
[ QUOTE ]
call and play back on flop seems like the best the options in your poll. unsure if its better than folding though. AT sucks, even though its sooted. 4-betting in this spot works if villain is of the sort to pull back a bit when he encounters something strange, and will probably read it for strength. If he's stubbornly overaggro and will just shove anything, then dont do that. Obv if you 4-bet either way, you need to fold to a shove. [/ QUOTE ] this sums up my thoughts as well
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
