#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: On prioritising hilarity value over EV.....
fantastic hand.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: On prioritising hilarity value over EV.....
[ QUOTE ]
i mean, to be fair, that "donk" was ahead on two of the three streets [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] ok lets count from 1 to 4 preeee flooooppp floooooppppp tuuuurn riiiivvvverrrRRRR i see both players ahead on two of the 4!!! streets |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: On prioritising hilarity value over EV.....
ill be the donk here is what im thinking:
flop: he doesnt have an ace since he wouldve raised preflop and he probably just wants a free card on the turn and with jq or jk and a bdfd. turn: im not gonna give him that free card the [censored] does he think he is, oh hes raising again maybe he does have an ace, but then again maybe that club gave him a flush draw with his straight draw and hes semibluffing river: lol he checked he missed, maybe he will call with king high im gonna take him to valuetow...he raised wtf oh well its only one more be9Jo HAYACHCAHYCAHCAY |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: On prioritising hilarity value over EV.....
Guy is soooo awful.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: On prioritising hilarity value over EV.....
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i mean, to be fair, that "donk" was ahead on two of the three streets [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] ok lets count from 1 to 4 preeee flooooppp floooooppppp tuuuurn riiiivvvverrrRRRR i see both players ahead on two of the 4!!! streets [/ QUOTE ] nit alert |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: On prioritising hilarity value over EV.....
Negative EV: -$55
Hilarity EV: $50 Add in the opponent tilt factor and I think we have a winner. |
|
|