Why do people play at party rather than stars?

[Ali shmali]

I do not play tourneys but I hear stars tourneys are much juicier the party tournies. Both STT's and MTT's.

[Sykes]

[ QUOTE ]
because party is a better site to make money at.

[/ QUOTE ] I did mention without mentioning fish.

[ QUOTE ]
It has a better interface,

[/ QUOTE ]

This is an opinion.

[ QUOTE ]
it deals hands faster

[/ QUOTE ]

Really? you have any facts behind that statement?

[ QUOTE ]
it has better table selection,

[/ QUOTE ]

again, you have ignored the first thing i said. Without mentioning fish.

[ QUOTE ]
it has better promotions,

[/ QUOTE ]

which are quickly drying up.

[ QUOTE ]
it has better cheater policy,

[/ QUOTE ]

really? show me how this is so. party currently has bots playing on it. you think this is fair?

[ QUOTE ]
it has better affiliate deals,

[/ QUOTE ]

again you mentioned what I did not want you people to mention.

[ QUOTE ]
it has better multi-tabling software.

[/ QUOTE ]

Stars is working on that.

[ QUOTE ]

Party has a bigger player base and my guess is that most 2p2ers have a party account.

[/ QUOTE ]

Really?

Right now, Friday, 2:30 pm.

Party: 40091

Stars: 41041

[fluorescenthippo]

[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
it deals hands faster

[/ QUOTE ]

Really? you have any facts behind that statement?


[/ QUOTE ]

just play one game at party and you will quickly see the difference.

[Sykes]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
it deals hands faster

[/ QUOTE ]

Really? you have any facts behind that statement?


[/ QUOTE ]

just play one game at party and you will quickly see the difference.

[/ QUOTE ]

If this is a big reason, then play at UB. They deal the hands way faster than party/stars.

[Sykes]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Without mention fish and rakeback

[/ QUOTE ]

Then why play at stars?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because the once every six months he e-mails support, their response is better, duh.

[/ QUOTE ]

..., you're a complete genius. I mean, of course, this is the best.

Do you not understand that if Stars advertised better and that we played there, then party would die and everyone would come to stars.

[DING-DONG YO]

I must say, this thread is really dumb.

OK, were it not for fish and unmentionable (which I don't get anyway because no one will PM me *sniff*), then we would all play at stars. The problem is, THOSE ARE ABOUT THE TWO BIGGEST CONSIDERATIONS! What purpose does it serve to leave them out of the discussion?

[Recliner]

[ QUOTE ]

Party has a bigger player base and my guess is that most 2p2ers have a party account.

[/ QUOTE ]

Really?

Right now, Friday, 2:30 pm.

Party: 40091

Stars: 41041

[/ QUOTE ]

Look at the number of players playing for real money. Party is going to be at least 4 times bigger. Party has more cash games and it's not even close.

I'm playing at Stars now because UB doesn't have enough 2/4 NL 6 max games, and Stars does. Stars doesn't have more than a couple 3/6 NL 6 max games so when I move up to that I'm going to have to go to Party. I will have zero choice because no other site is able to spread the games I want.

[Barrin6]

For low stakes, I see no difference in fishnesses. I'm surrounded by [censored] at the small stakes tables.

[Sykes]

[ QUOTE ]
I must say, this thread is really dumb.

OK, were it not for fish and unmentionable (which I don't get anyway because no one will PM me *sniff*), then we would all play at stars. The problem is, THOSE ARE ABOUT THE TWO BIGGEST CONSIDERATIONS! What purpose does it serve to leave them out of the discussion?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok, Unless I'm mistaken, but doesn't stars have something equivelent to rakeback? Plus the rake at stars is lower than the rake at party.

So basically, the main argument is "fish",

[fluorescenthippo]

right now

party 44014

stars 39130


2:57 pm