Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-10-2007, 03:13 AM
Mench Mench is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Strong Island
Posts: 1,861
Default Re: $114 really weird hand vs Poker_in_PB

i miss sngs.

when i played like thousands on party at the 55s, i would shove here, while saying to myself stupid reg has to have QQ-AA here. i mean regs just dont limp a wide enough range.

yah i shove AK here all day, but I don't think not shoving is criminal since against regs over enough sngs you can develop pretty reliable ranges for limping/minraising etc esp at later levels
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-10-2007, 03:25 AM
Luisgallo Luisgallo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: in route to supernova...
Posts: 1,307
Default Re: $114 really weird hand vs Poker_in_PB

I normally instashove, but here the point is a HUGE read vs poker_in_pb.

I really really like your preflop line but then you confused me on your postflop, why playing so passively?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-10-2007, 04:55 AM
RexWoo RexWoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 16s & 27s
Posts: 3,419
Default Re: $114 really weird hand vs Poker_in_PB

Sorry but this is a case of a laser read that villain has only QQ+.

If those conditions, shoving seems super bad.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-10-2007, 08:39 AM
darinvg darinvg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boston Area
Posts: 1,067
Default Re: $114 really weird hand vs Poker_in_PB

This is QQ+ unless he reads this post and changes. Check it down.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-10-2007, 11:25 AM
donkeykong2 donkeykong2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 970
Default Re: $114 really weird hand vs Poker_in_PB

you played that hand as bad as you can imo [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-10-2007, 04:07 PM
kleath kleath is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: /\\ lean wit it rock wit it/\\
Posts: 1,800
Default Re: $114 really weird hand vs Poker_in_PB

[ QUOTE ]
you played that hand as bad as you can imo [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

That's constructive.

There's like multiple ways you could mean here.

I guess Im not experienced in playing AK in unraised pots with 10bbs, its like my mouse was gravitating towards the slider to at least bet something. The message is definitely clear though, [censored] poker in pb
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-10-2007, 07:09 PM
Little John Little John is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,843
Default Re: $114 really weird hand vs Poker_in_PB

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
you played that hand as bad as you can imo [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

That's constructive.

There's like multiple ways you could mean here.

I guess Im not experienced in playing AK in unraised pots with 10bbs, its like my mouse was gravitating towards the slider to at least bet something. The message is definitely clear though, [censored] poker in pb

[/ QUOTE ]

i think the message is clear that nobody likes

poker_dik_head_pb.

i dont think the message is clear to push preflop though.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-10-2007, 07:17 PM
suzzer99 suzzer99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: guuhhhn inner nets
Posts: 13,634
Default Re: $114 really weird hand vs Poker_in_PB

Against anyone else on earth this is a trivially easy shove. Are we clear on that? But apparently turdboy only does this with monsters. In 15k sngs or so I've never gotten a read like that on someone, but I do believe it here.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-10-2007, 08:01 PM
kleath kleath is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: /\\ lean wit it rock wit it/\\
Posts: 1,800
Default Re: $114 really weird hand vs Poker_in_PB

[ QUOTE ]
Against anyone else on earth this is a trivially easy shove. Are we clear on that? But apparently turdboy only does this with monsters. In 15k sngs or so I've never gotten a read like that on someone, but I do believe it here.

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought it was a given that 99.999% of the time this a super clear shove, my main question is what other people thought on if this is a .001% case(and how they would play postflop in that situation), I thought it was at the time. Postflop was very bad as I played it.

Ty for the comments everyone, appreciate it.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-10-2007, 08:06 PM
jkpoker jkpoker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Grinding
Posts: 550
Default Re: $114 really weird hand vs Poker_in_PB

if your read was good which a call from those stats seems like a big hand then your call on flop was horrid.

and bet on river was worse....

if you read is that you should check and only pay if A and A alone hits try to check down cheap if K hits
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.