Kidpoker > Stinger

[wdrzich]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
more details on the cts thm please


[/ QUOTE ]

Well I can't win if I fold....

[/ QUOTE ]

i'm pretty sure the cts theorem is that no one ever has anything on a four flush board

[AceCR9]

[ QUOTE ]
lol i don't see the $100/$200 stars guys winning in Vegas for years.

maybe they do have an edge in NLHE. but remember... most of these HSNL guys couldn't beat $1/$2 Omaha and don't know any other games. they're not true poker players.

DN is good at all games and a better poker player than anyone on the internet.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol

[BarryLyndon]

This thread is terrbile. Also, Daniel's call was ass.

Barry

[RichGangi]

Well said, HV. Excellent post.

[ArmenH]

LOL at DN thinking Stinger only value bets river with "Q high flush".

[ASPoker8]

[ QUOTE ]
lol i don't see the $100/$200 stars guys winning in Vegas for years.

maybe they do have an edge in NLHE. but remember... most of these HSNL guys couldn't beat $1/$2 Omaha and don't know any other games. they're not true poker players.

DN is good at all games and a better poker player than anyone on the internet.

[/ QUOTE ]

Donkey-Miller, I can't figure out if you are a troll or if you are really just that awful at poker. Every single post I've seen you make recently has made me laugh out loud

[Stinger88]

[ QUOTE ]
lol i don't see the $100/$200 stars guys winning in Vegas for years.

maybe they do have an edge in NLHE. but remember... most of these HSNL guys couldn't beat $1/$2 Omaha and don't know any other games. they're not true poker players.

DN is good at all games and a better poker player than anyone on the internet.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you mean PLO then lol, but I'm fairly confident I could beat 1/2 O8 even with very limited experience.

[AK87]

PokerStars Game #12056058227: Tournament #61178034, $2000+$50 Hold'em No Limit - Match Round I, Level I (10/20) - 2007/09/14 - 15:48:00 (ET)
Table '61178034 1' 2-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: OnTheRize (690 in chips)
Seat 2: AK87 (2310 in chips)
AK87: posts small blind 10
OnTheRize: posts big blind 20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to AK87 [8s Jh]
AK87: raises 40 to 60
OnTheRize: calls 40
*** FLOP *** [Ts As 5h]
OnTheRize: checks
AK87: bets 80
OnTheRize: calls 80
*** TURN *** [Ts As 5h] [2s]
OnTheRize: checks
AK87: bets 140
OnTheRize: calls 140
*** RIVER *** [Ts As 5h 2s] [6s]
OnTheRize: checks
AK87: bets 1820
OnTheRize: calls 410 and is all-in
*** SHOW DOWN ***
AK87: shows [8s Jh] (a flush, Ace high)
OnTheRize: shows [Jd Tc] (a pair of Tens)
AK87 collected 1380 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 1380 | Rake 0
Board [Ts As 5h 2s 6s]
Seat 1: OnTheRize (big blind) showed [Jd Tc] and lost with a pair of Tens
Seat 2: AK87 (button) (small blind) showed [8s Jh] and won (1380) with a flush, Ace high

AK87 = Stinger 88
OnTheRize = KidPoker

[lapoker17]

[ QUOTE ]

i'm pretty sure the cts theorem is that no one ever has anything on a four flush board


[/ QUOTE ]

i'm pretty sure the cts theorem has cost me mid 5 figures since i began applying it.

[NicksDad1970]

[ QUOTE ]
*** RIVER *** [8s 5h As Ks] [6s]
$tinger 88: bets $10200
KidPoker said, "lol no way"
KidPoker said, "I just dont buy it"
KidPoker said, "you ALWAYS have a Q hi flush?"
KidPoker: calls $10200

I was watching the game a couple a days ago where stinger made a similar bet on the river $10400 (if i rember correctly) on a similar board. DN was thinking about that bet for quite long and folded. Anyone has a HH for that hand?

[/ QUOTE ]

IIRC the board paired on the river and DN said "I think you 2 outered me".