Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 09-02-2007, 12:49 PM
Paul Levy Paul Levy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bob Janjuah is my hero
Posts: 353
Default Re: No love for Harrington

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
About the M concept: in most of the strategy posts I've been reading, the medium and short stack decisions are seldom based on an M number; rather, the "number of big blinds" count seems to be the only metric that matters, and the concept of stack-to-pot size seems largely forgotten.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know where you read that, but it's hideously wrong. Stack-to-pot is what matters, regardless of what you call it. Measuring in terms of BB causes all kinds of problems - the most obvious is that you're not accounting for antes.
[...]

This is why BB-to-stack can't be used universally, but a stack to pot measurement can. It's also important when you're considering bet sizes, you can't just bet x BB, you will often have to adjust to structures that aren't nice and neat 1x/2x SB/BB that a lot of people are used to online.


[/ QUOTE ]

Man, you're preaching to the converted here, I agree with you 100%. But go check the MTT strategy forums and count the threads where the metric is #BBs vs the threads where it's M. Either I've picked a freaky sample or indeed BBs are what most people refer to these days.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 09-02-2007, 01:14 PM
Eponymous Eponymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: jell-o is out to get me
Posts: 530
Default Re: No love for Harrington

[ QUOTE ]
thats cuz hes a breast lookin specialist, his eyes are really lookin at her chest the whole time. Thats what makes him so good at poker, it looks like hes lookin at the board but hes really lookin at ur face.

[/ QUOTE ]

Here's someone who hasn't mastered this ability. He tries to hide his peeks in blinks and nods, but he's not fooling anyone.

Kimberly and Sexton
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 09-02-2007, 01:54 PM
sopoRific sopoRific is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Professional Lurker
Posts: 31
Default Re: No love for Harrington

[ QUOTE ]
Man, you're preaching to the converted here, I agree with you 100%. But go check the MTT strategy forums and count the threads where the metric is #BBs vs the threads where it's M. Either I've picked a freaky sample or indeed BBs are what most people refer to these days.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think the size of the Big Blind is more accessible of a number than the starting size of the pot. The BB size is always prominently shown on the of the window you're playing on while the starting pot, is only shown at the start of a hand (or one has to do a quick mental calculation). It's not a lot of work, but it's some, and the easy/lazy way is to base decisions off the BB.

Also, I've noticed that a lot of HH converters don't bother with antes or the starting pot size, which makes using the starting pot in calculations slightly harder.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 09-03-2007, 12:18 AM
coordi coordi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: running bad, playing bad
Posts: 1,622
Default Re: No love for Harrington

Harrington is a master of his time. 15 years ago
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 09-03-2007, 03:44 AM
SteelWheel SteelWheel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 105
Default Re: No love for Harrington

This is kind of splitting hairs. In later stages of tournaments, where one has to play a lot of shove-it-in poker, a "10BBs remaining" situation is approximately equal to a "5M" situation. I think that M is a slightly better indicator, and stack-to-pot considerations are still valid, of course.

However, if every poker authority/commentator/writer/whatever referred exclusively to "BBs remaining" rather than "M", they would still be referencing the same basic concept. Different terminology, differently scaled ruler--no big deal..
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 09-03-2007, 04:06 AM
sharkstevie sharkstevie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 222
Default Re: No love for Harrington

Harrington ownz
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 09-03-2007, 03:00 PM
Paul Levy Paul Levy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bob Janjuah is my hero
Posts: 353
Default Re: No love for Harrington

[ QUOTE ]
This is kind of splitting hairs. In later stages of tournaments, where one has to play a lot of shove-it-in poker, a "10BBs remaining" situation is approximately equal to a "5M" situation. I think that M is a slightly better indicator, and stack-to-pot considerations are still valid, of course.

However, if every poker authority/commentator/writer/whatever referred exclusively to "BBs remaining" rather than "M", they would still be referencing the same basic concept. Different terminology, differently scaled ruler--no big deal..

[/ QUOTE ]

I think there's more than that, to the extent that another 2+2er recently was telling me of how the concept of M is obsolete and the metric for the knowledgeable player is the #BB which in the presence of antes is refined into the "effective big blind", equal to 2/3 of the starting pot. Seems like efforts are being made to refine that measure, which wouldn't be the case if it was just an arithmetic convenience.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 09-03-2007, 03:27 PM
Ckrad Ckrad is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 51
Default Re: No love for Harrington

The girl giving the interview needs to be hit in the face.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 09-03-2007, 03:46 PM
kardkiller66 kardkiller66 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 20
Default Re: No love for Harrington

that girl on the interview is so hot, she is my favorite, forget about dan.....
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 09-03-2007, 03:54 PM
Dima2000123 Dima2000123 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 813
Default Re: No love for Harrington

Dan looks like a mummy in the two CP videos. He doesn't change that impression even after he starts speaking.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.