micro stakes shorthanded statistics--please help!

[BLumbergh]

Hey everybody--I've played 6-max for a long time now, and haven't been very good, but I just recently got PokerTracker and have data for 6,000 hands at .05/.10 with an awful rate of -4.14 bb/100.

Can anybody take a look at these stats (I know 6k isn't quite significant enough) and tell me what I need to fix? You'd think it would be easy to beat the .05/.10 tables, but I've been having a hard time for awhile now. Thanks!

[HOWMANY]

Showing down 27% of your hands makes it pretty much physically impossible for you to win.

[BLumbergh]

about what percentage should it be? thanks for the post.

[BLumbergh]

i won at SD 54% of the time though--is that bad?

[The Funky Llama]

wow, playing only 18% of your hands and showing down 27% of the time is pretty amazing. Do you always fold to a raise or something?

[BLumbergh]

not really, what should my numbers look like?

[Oink]

Check the FAQ.

But 18VPIP/27WTSD is pretty amazing. The higher the VPIP the lower your WTSD becomes as you play more marginal hands. Most players here has VPIP 25-35 and WTSD 32-40.

Folding BB to steal 75 is also very high IMO.

VPIP/PFR of 18/15 is too tight. Try raising a tad more and definetly play more hands out of the big blind and small blind. Do you call suited hands in the small blind with limpers? stuff like that.

Your flop and turn aggression factors seem very high at 4.2 and 5.0. Maybe you dont peel enough in spots where you have odds?

[BLumbergh]

ok, thanks a lot. what do you mean by "peel"?

i haven't heard that term yet.

[Oink]

[ QUOTE ]
ok, thanks a lot. what do you mean by "peel"?

i haven't heard that term yet.

[/ QUOTE ]

Call. To "peel" one card of the deck

[BLumbergh]

ok thanks man. so you're saying maybe check and then call with odds instead of betting outright?