|
|
#11
08-31-2007, 05:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars 5-10 6 max, is it beatable?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Not possible. Rock garden, every opponent is expert. [/ QUOTE ] if ur beating it for 1 bb/100 ur playin 11-12 tables [/ QUOTE ] FYP 
|
|
#12
08-31-2007, 05:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stars 5-10 6 max, is it beatable?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Not possible. Rock garden, every opponent is sethypooh21. [/ QUOTE ] FYP [/ QUOTE ] Heh. And who might you be?
|
|
#14
08-31-2007, 05:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stars 5-10 6 max, is it beatable?
[ QUOTE ]
So rocks don't mind playing rocks? I mean, surely some are playing for their livelihood. [/ QUOTE ] Poor playing tag =/= rock and no, I don't mind having a rock at a 6max table at all. Why yes, I would like your blinds, sir.
|
|
#16
08-31-2007, 07:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stars 5-10 6 max, is it beatable?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Not possible. Rock garden, every opponent is expert. [/ QUOTE ] if ur beating it for 1 bb/100 ur playin 11-12 tables [/ QUOTE ] FYP [/ QUOTE ] impressive, gl, ty for info
|
|
#17
08-31-2007, 07:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stars 5-10 6 max, is it beatable?
bk it is most definitely beatable, but most can't beat it enough to just sit at any table and park there, game selection is key. your avg table is tougher than any holdem game that has ever been spread at foxwoods. and at least a half dozen of the regulars are tougher than anyone i've ever played with there so if you sit at a table with a bunch of them, good luck.
|
|
#18
08-31-2007, 08:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stars 5-10 6 max, is it beatable?
[ QUOTE ]
bk it is most definitely beatable, but most can't beat it enough to just sit at any table and park there, game selection is key. your avg table is tougher than any holdem game that has ever been spread at foxwoods. and at least a half dozen of the regulars are tougher than anyone i've ever played with there so if you sit at a table with a bunch of them, good luck. [/ QUOTE ] i have no game selection, i just sit down and play 7-8 tables and collect fpps, i get 2k fpps per 600 hands so i can rack em up good at supernova. foxwoods 20-40/75-150 games i would equate to .02-.04 on stars. I got about 2 million hands online since 2002 so i been dealing with these maniacs for years, but never so low as to where the rake would come into play. ty jba maybe see u down foxwoods sometime
|
|
#19
09-02-2007, 03:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stars 5-10 6 max, is it beatable?
Thinking of rakeback you could have made $2K or so (maybe one can turn some points to cash at PS, not sure anymore) and then picking some better tables, and one makes money.
If one is interested of playing so many hands per hour, it makes more sense to play heads up, that also is possible to beat with a low rake and a rakeback and better quality games (than what stars generally has). One though may need to wait at many sites, to get opponents, but one can always play SH till one gets an opponent. By the way, sitting to a table where there is someone waiting already, is not generally good table selection. Limit games have generally too high rakes from 2-4 to 5-10 and even at 10-20 until one knows better.
|
|
#20
09-02-2007, 01:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stars 5-10 6 max, is it beatable?
LOL wait ur asking if 5-10 LIMIT is beatable? LOLOLOL
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
