#1
|
|||
|
|||
No hand converter, 1/2 LO8 hand
Full Tilt Poker Game #1948256352: Table Anthem - $1/$2 - Limit Omaha Hi/Lo - 19:13:37 ET - 2007/03/08
Seat 1: leolaw ($19.25) Seat 2: 101ita91 ($8.75) Seat 3: etinks ($73.75) Seat 4: Murakawa ($39.75) Seat 5: varmitt ($63.25) Seat 6: Madcity_83 ($84.25) Seat 7: grizz24hi ($46) Seat 8: lilsunshine222 ($59.50) Seat 9: BrandonMC33 ($38.50) grizz24hi posts the small blind of $0.50 lilsunshine222 posts the big blind of $1 The button is in seat #6 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Murakawa [Tc 9c 2d Ad] BrandonMC33 calls $1 leolaw folds 101ita91 folds etinks folds Murakawa calls $1 varmitt folds Madcity_83 folds grizz24hi calls $0.50 lilsunshine222 checks *** FLOP *** [Qh 3h 7s] grizz24hi checks lilsunshine222 bets $1 BrandonMC33 calls $1 Murakawa calls $1 grizz24hi folds *** TURN *** [Qh 3h 7s] [8d] lilsunshine222 checks BrandonMC33 bets $2 Murakawa calls $2 lilsunshine222 calls $2 *** RIVER *** [Qh 3h 7s 8d] [Ac] lilsunshine222 bets $2 BrandonMC33 calls $2 Murakawa? No reads. Upon |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No hand converter, 1/2 LO8 hand
don't call or raise
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No hand converter, 1/2 LO8 hand
As in fold? that's what I Did...
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No hand converter, 1/2 LO8 hand
I think you have to fold. Once in a while your aces will be good for high or you'll get a quarter for low, but I think the chances are small enough that a fold is correct.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No hand converter, 1/2 LO8 hand
A fold is standard and frustrating. I'd call with aces up though, on that board.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No hand converter, 1/2 LO8 hand
I'm not too caught up on >2 players LO8, but can we find a fold on the flop here? We don't even have bd flush draws.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No hand converter, 1/2 LO8 hand
Folding flop doesn't seem right. If you assume that it's 70% likely that you are the only one with a nut low draw, you have about 25% pot equity there (accounting for chance of quartering) and another 5% or so from the backdoor str8. And you only have to call one more SB into a 6SB pot to see another card. Folding here is crazy weak-tight, I think you play too much pot limit [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img].
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No hand converter, 1/2 LO8 hand
[ QUOTE ]
Folding flop doesn't seem right. If you assume that it's 70% likely that you are the only one with a nut low draw, you have about 25% pot equity there (accounting for chance of quartering) and another 5% or so from the backdoor str8. And you only have to call one more SB into a 6SB pot to see another card. Folding here is crazy weak-tight, I think you play too much pot limit [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]. [/ QUOTE ] I'm not going to fold this flop no way no how. River... you know with the river I have a 2 way hand it's just not the nuts. Against 3 opponents it's not that bad, but they're both playing like they have 2 different nuts. I guess I posted this because I would have won the low (the other guy had A4 and nothing else) and the high hand didn't have anything for low. I think calling is losing money in the logn run. Thanks for the simple but consise responses! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No hand converter, 1/2 LO8 hand
[ QUOTE ] I'm not too caught up on >2 players LO8, but can we find a fold on the flop here? We don't even have bd flush draws. [/ QUOTE ] With no pair, no real draw, I'll usually fold the flop against decent opponents. Without a read at 1-2, I'm not folding the flop though, because there are really some bad ones that litterally play 90% of their hands. I want to find that out right away and how bad they are after the flop. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No hand converter, 1/2 LO8 hand
We have a pair of aces which could hold up, and we have nut low draw.
As you say at 1/2 there are some bad players, and you're right. [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I'm not too caught up on >2 players LO8, but can we find a fold on the flop here? We don't even have bd flush draws. [/ QUOTE ] With no pair, no real draw, I'll usually fold the flop against decent opponents. Without a read at 1-2, I'm not folding the flop though, because there are really some bad ones that litterally play 90% of their hands. I want to find that out right away and how bad they are after the flop. [/ QUOTE ] |
|
|