Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Poker > Omaha/8
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-08-2007, 08:21 PM
Murakawa Murakawa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 632
Default No hand converter, 1/2 LO8 hand

Full Tilt Poker Game #1948256352: Table Anthem - $1/$2 - Limit Omaha Hi/Lo - 19:13:37 ET - 2007/03/08
Seat 1: leolaw ($19.25)
Seat 2: 101ita91 ($8.75)
Seat 3: etinks ($73.75)
Seat 4: Murakawa ($39.75)
Seat 5: varmitt ($63.25)
Seat 6: Madcity_83 ($84.25)
Seat 7: grizz24hi ($46)
Seat 8: lilsunshine222 ($59.50)
Seat 9: BrandonMC33 ($38.50)
grizz24hi posts the small blind of $0.50
lilsunshine222 posts the big blind of $1
The button is in seat #6
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Murakawa [Tc 9c 2d Ad]
BrandonMC33 calls $1
leolaw folds
101ita91 folds
etinks folds
Murakawa calls $1
varmitt folds
Madcity_83 folds
grizz24hi calls $0.50
lilsunshine222 checks
*** FLOP *** [Qh 3h 7s]
grizz24hi checks
lilsunshine222 bets $1
BrandonMC33 calls $1
Murakawa calls $1
grizz24hi folds
*** TURN *** [Qh 3h 7s] [8d]
lilsunshine222 checks
BrandonMC33 bets $2
Murakawa calls $2
lilsunshine222 calls $2
*** RIVER *** [Qh 3h 7s 8d] [Ac]
lilsunshine222 bets $2
BrandonMC33 calls $2


Murakawa?



No reads. Upon
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-08-2007, 10:17 PM
Habib Marwan Habib Marwan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: teh chark iss coaming
Posts: 740
Default Re: No hand converter, 1/2 LO8 hand

don't call or raise
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-09-2007, 03:27 AM
Murakawa Murakawa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 632
Default Re: No hand converter, 1/2 LO8 hand

As in fold? that's what I Did...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-09-2007, 12:15 PM
bbartlog bbartlog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 882
Default Re: No hand converter, 1/2 LO8 hand

I think you have to fold. Once in a while your aces will be good for high or you'll get a quarter for low, but I think the chances are small enough that a fold is correct.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-09-2007, 02:01 PM
I dunno I dunno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Waiting for a hit and run
Posts: 494
Default Re: No hand converter, 1/2 LO8 hand

A fold is standard and frustrating. I'd call with aces up though, on that board.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-09-2007, 03:05 PM
Shabamabam Shabamabam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 567
Default Re: No hand converter, 1/2 LO8 hand

I'm not too caught up on >2 players LO8, but can we find a fold on the flop here? We don't even have bd flush draws.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-09-2007, 05:25 PM
bbartlog bbartlog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 882
Default Re: No hand converter, 1/2 LO8 hand

Folding flop doesn't seem right. If you assume that it's 70% likely that you are the only one with a nut low draw, you have about 25% pot equity there (accounting for chance of quartering) and another 5% or so from the backdoor str8. And you only have to call one more SB into a 6SB pot to see another card. Folding here is crazy weak-tight, I think you play too much pot limit [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img].
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-09-2007, 07:16 PM
Murakawa Murakawa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 632
Default Re: No hand converter, 1/2 LO8 hand

[ QUOTE ]
Folding flop doesn't seem right. If you assume that it's 70% likely that you are the only one with a nut low draw, you have about 25% pot equity there (accounting for chance of quartering) and another 5% or so from the backdoor str8. And you only have to call one more SB into a 6SB pot to see another card. Folding here is crazy weak-tight, I think you play too much pot limit [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img].

[/ QUOTE ]


I'm not going to fold this flop no way no how. River... you know with the river I have a 2 way hand it's just not the nuts. Against 3 opponents it's not that bad, but they're both playing like they have 2 different nuts. I guess I posted this because I would have won the low (the other guy had A4 and nothing else) and the high hand didn't have anything for low. I think calling is losing money in the logn run.

Thanks for the simple but consise responses!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-10-2007, 02:29 PM
I dunno I dunno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Waiting for a hit and run
Posts: 494
Default Re: No hand converter, 1/2 LO8 hand


[ QUOTE ]
I'm not too caught up on >2 players LO8, but can we find a fold on the flop here? We don't even have bd flush draws.

[/ QUOTE ]

With no pair, no real draw, I'll usually fold the flop against decent opponents. Without a read at 1-2, I'm not folding the flop though, because there are really some bad ones that litterally play 90% of their hands. I want to find that out right away and how bad they are after the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-10-2007, 04:55 PM
Murakawa Murakawa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 632
Default Re: No hand converter, 1/2 LO8 hand

We have a pair of aces which could hold up, and we have nut low draw.

As you say at 1/2 there are some bad players, and you're right.

[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm not too caught up on >2 players LO8, but can we find a fold on the flop here? We don't even have bd flush draws.

[/ QUOTE ]

With no pair, no real draw, I'll usually fold the flop against decent opponents. Without a read at 1-2, I'm not folding the flop though, because there are really some bad ones that litterally play 90% of their hands. I want to find that out right away and how bad they are after the flop.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.