*** Official Fantasy Football Start'em/Sit'em Thread: SEPT ***

[Jack of Arcades]

Warrick Dunn

[Slow Play Ray]

anyone think i should bench holt or boldin in favor of calvin johnson this week?

[BillNye]

[ QUOTE ]
anyone think i should bench holt or boldin in favor of calvin johnson this week?

[/ QUOTE ]

Always play worse wrs against elite D's, how else do you win ffb?

[Slow Play Ray]

you consider minnesota an elite d?

[Perplexity]

Should I start the Colts or Vikings DST this week? It seems really close. DST counts for a lot in this league; scoring is 20FPP minus points allowed (and it can go negative), plus 9 pts for TDs, 2 for INT, 1 for sack. So like the Vikings were worth 45FPP last week, and Giants were worth -20FPP.

So, Colts or Vikings?

[rafiki]

[ QUOTE ]
you consider minnesota an elite d?

[/ QUOTE ]

Their secondary still has somethign to prove. Apparantly they've come very far since last year. I think this is the game they prove it (or not). In light of that, Holt is better to start. But to answer your question, yes the vikes could have a top 3 D this year.

[MacGuyV]

I don't think their secondary is bad; they just had no pass-rush last year...I'm not sure if they've upgraded that area this year.
But yah you can't play a rookie over Holt/Boldin.

[sixfour]

Cutler, Rivers or Losman? Standard Yahoo, going with Cutler at the moment

[Slow Play Ray]

[ QUOTE ]
I don't think their secondary is bad; they just had no pass-rush last year...I'm not sure if they've upgraded that area this year.
But yah you can't play a rookie over Holt/Boldin.

[/ QUOTE ]

i can't stop thinking about the potential genius points for such moves.

[Perplexity]

[ QUOTE ]
Cutler, Rivers or Losman? Standard Yahoo, going with Cutler at the moment

[/ QUOTE ]

Cutler, not close