|
|
#11
07-28-2006, 01:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50: multiway flush draw
unless I have a read otherwise I would assume ducks are an overlimp here not a raise. raising with ducks to hit a bigger pot when you have a set is not a great idea. too many times someone will repop before the flop and implied odds start to drop real fast.
|
|
#12
07-28-2006, 02:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL50: multiway flush draw
UTG+1 has half his stack in, he ain't folding, so there are no implied odds. You can't just call, so you would have to push to stay in.
Odds of hitting: 1:2 Payoff: 54:94 It's a slight dog. Fold.
|
|
#13
07-28-2006, 02:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL50: multiway flush draw
[ QUOTE ]
raising with ducks to hit a bigger pot when you have a set is not a great idea. too many times someone will repop before the flop and implied odds start to drop real fast. [/ QUOTE ] just because I love quoting this: "because you have an equity edge, because it makes you harder to read, because flopping a set in a raised pot>>flopping a set in a limped pot, because raising is more fun, because you can't win the blinds by limping, and probably some other reasons I'm not thinking of..." - TWP
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
