Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 11-13-2007, 07:10 PM
Kneel B4 Zod Kneel B4 Zod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nobody roots for Goliath
Posts: 11,725
Default Re: NFL- GB Packers

the ESPN reason for moving Indy to #3 is actually reasonable - it's not a rating of who might be or could be the best, it's a measure of what's going on right now.

if Indy had to play Dallas tomorrow, I dunno, it's close I guess.

If Indy is somewhat healthier, Indy is better.

losing Freeney for the year is significant really only wrt to a potential Patriots game - the Colts would still be better than anyone else imo (assuming Harrison, Clark, et al come back)
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-13-2007, 07:26 PM
PokerFink PokerFink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Keyra is back
Posts: 7,209
Default Re: NFL- GB Packers

It also has a lot to do with Dallas. The Cowboys are really, really, really [censored] good. Right now, with injuries, Dallas>Indy, so it's not unreasonable to have Dallas #2. Even at 100% health the gap is small.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-13-2007, 08:38 PM
dlk9s dlk9s is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: It\'s not gonna happen.
Posts: 3,410
Default Re: NFL- GB Packers

I'm going to take a wild guess and say that areinitz is a Vikings fan.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-13-2007, 08:44 PM
jstnrgrs jstnrgrs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,840
Default Re: NFL- GB Packers

beatpaths.com has had them highly ranked for several weeks. The rankings for this week haven't been posted yet, but I think they will be 2nd.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-13-2007, 08:48 PM
dlk9s dlk9s is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: It\'s not gonna happen.
Posts: 3,410
Default Re: NFL- GB Packers

Well, hopefully the voters can get the polls straightened out so that the correct teams go to BCS bowls.

EDIT: I don't feel the Packers are "underrated." They are the 2nd best team in the NFC. Now that Indy has lost two in a row (although injuries played a major part on Sunday night), I could see GB being anywhere from #3 ahead of Indy and Pitt, to #5 behind them. I wouldn't argue with GB being slotted at 3, 4, or 5, as they have a better record than those other two teams, but those other two have also lost to New England, which almost doesn't count at this point.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-13-2007, 09:44 PM
Jay Riall Jay Riall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Over the line
Posts: 15,184
Default Re: NFL- GB Packers

[ QUOTE ]
Are people really that quick to place Indy below Dal? A couple weeks ago this would be laughable. But now a massively unhealthy Indy loses a hard fought battle vs the Pats and has a bad game vs SD we are ready to demote them to possibly 3rd place? In my mind there is no question they are the 2nd best team in the league.

[/ QUOTE ]

I take back this post seeing as we are considering injuries and all. The loss of Freeney is going to hurt them soo much imo. He was getting a hell of a lot of pressure on Brady in Week 9.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-13-2007, 10:57 PM
Golden_Rhino Golden_Rhino is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nowhere Fast
Posts: 3,879
Default Re: NFL- GB Packers



What can I say, I love this guy!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.