Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > MTT Community
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #261  
Old 10-19-2007, 02:36 PM
crashjr crashjr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Track
Posts: 357
Default Re: Steps on Stars

I'd really like to see protected steps, where buy-ins to steps four, five, and six must be made with a ticket won in a lower step. I also like the single table step 6 described above.
Reply With Quote
  #262  
Old 10-19-2007, 03:26 PM
Bavid Denyamine Bavid Denyamine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Observer Chat
Posts: 640
Default Re: Steps on Stars -- feedback requested

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Sounds good, what about being able to use a Step 5 ticket to buy into a $650 qualifier?

[/ QUOTE ]

The Steps are separate from the other qualification paths, by design. The Steps tickets are good only within the Steps system. Allowing them to be used outside of the Steps system would undermine said system. There are many, many opportunities to reach the $650 qualifiers without buying in directly.

All the best,

Bryan S.
Tournaments Administrator
PokerStars Poker Room Management Team

[/ QUOTE ]

Bryan, does that mean that Steps tickets are worthless after PCA qualification begins? If it's just generic T$/W$, I don't see why this should be an issue.

Either way, steps are great! Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #263  
Old 10-19-2007, 03:41 PM
rage4dorder rage4dorder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 190
Default Re: Steps on Stars -- feedback requested

i prefer the 2 table step 6.

but having both 6 and 6(a) is fine if they both run.
Reply With Quote
  #264  
Old 10-19-2007, 03:44 PM
dmk dmk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Twilight
Posts: 14,348
Default Re: Steps on Stars -- feedback requested

Bryan,

Turbos. Please. Thats more important than anything else.

Thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #265  
Old 10-19-2007, 03:55 PM
QualityStreet QualityStreet is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1
Default Re: Steps on Stars -- feedback requested

So, at last I come out of hiding to register my preference:

6(a) please. Ticket buy-in only would be most especially pleasing to me. You could do that: only allow cash buyins for the 6 tournaments?

Now, I'm going to search the threads and reprimand all those who use 'would of' instead of would've, 'should of' instead of should've, 'could of' instead of could've. Oh the shudders that causes! Jen Harman: you're on my list!
Reply With Quote
  #266  
Old 10-19-2007, 04:10 PM
nutshot2 nutshot2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Bronx Zoo
Posts: 1,268
Default Re: Steps on Stars -- feedback requested

Bryan,

While you're reading this... AUTO ADD-ON

hijack over.

Tell Jeanne D I said hi.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #267  
Old 10-19-2007, 04:26 PM
DeuceSeven DeuceSeven is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: deuceseven.blogspot.com
Posts: 1,765
Default Re: Steps on Stars -- feedback requested

I'm a low limit player, I vote for steps 6a & 6, these are such a great idea for players like me. Also did you lock out step 3? I can't register with a ticket and no one else is either.
Reply With Quote
  #268  
Old 10-19-2007, 05:35 PM
PujolsOfPokr PujolsOfPokr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: ..in a Stars\' donkament..
Posts: 114
Default Re: Steps on Stars -- feedback requested

Hi Bryan,

What is quite important to me, and a lot of the other players trying to make their way up the Step system, is that players that have already won their PCA seats are NOT allowed to sit back down and continue abusing the Step system for their own profit.

It is rather discouraging to see the same group of 5 high-stakes SnG pros sitting at the Step 6's as they wait all day for them to fill up with lower-limit players. If the step system was truly implemented as a STG method of allowing lower-limit players to qualify for the PCA, then having the same group of pros who have already won their PCA seats sit and wait all day for the 18-man tourneys to fill up becomes rather counter-productive.

So please: No buying in to Step 6 if you have already won a PCA package!
Reply With Quote
  #269  
Old 10-19-2007, 05:49 PM
smartalecc5 smartalecc5 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NL600 & MTTs
Posts: 4,006
Default Re: Steps on Stars -- feedback requested

Two things that are more important than 6a.

Hi Bryan,

What is quite important to me, and a lot of the other players trying to make their way up the Step system, is that players that have already won their PCA seats are NOT allowed to sit back down and continue abusing the Step system for their own profit.

It is rather discouraging to see the same group of 5 high-stakes SnG pros sitting at the Step 6's as they wait all day for them to fill up with lower-limit players. If the step system was truly implemented as a STG method of allowing lower-limit players to qualify for the PCA, then having the same group of pros who have already won their PCA seats sit and wait all day for the 18-man tourneys to fill up becomes rather counter-productive.

So please: No buying in to Step 6 if you have already won a PCA package!

Also, turbo tables (or even like semi-turbo with 10min levels)
Reply With Quote
  #270  
Old 10-19-2007, 05:55 PM
CharlieDontSurf CharlieDontSurf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Just call it. Friendo.
Posts: 8,355
Default Re: Steps on Stars -- feedback requested

[ QUOTE ]
Two things that are more important than 6a.

Hi Bryan,

What is quite important to me, and a lot of the other players trying to make their way up the Step system, is that players that have already won their PCA seats are NOT allowed to sit back down and continue abusing the Step system for their own profit.

It is rather discouraging to see the same group of 5 high-stakes SnG pros sitting at the Step 6's as they wait all day for them to fill up with lower-limit players. If the step system was truly implemented as a STG method of allowing lower-limit players to qualify for the PCA, then having the same group of pros who have already won their PCA seats sit and wait all day for the 18-man tourneys to fill up becomes rather counter-productive.

So please: No buying in to Step 6 if you have already won a PCA package!

Also, turbo tables (or even like semi-turbo with 10min levels)

[/ QUOTE ]

PSBry
Agree that turbos would be cool, esp at the lower levels.

If you switch to the 6a format with payouts 1-7...i could care less if the same people want to buy-in over and over again after they have won a seat
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.