Two hands from a coaching session

[PBJaxx]

[ QUOTE ]
i really doubt value betting a queen in hand 2 is +ev at 100 nl.

[/ QUOTE ]
This is probably right. I haven't played 100NL for quite awhile. Disregard that comment.

[snowbank]

for small stakes nl these hands are not played well.

[aislephive]

I think hand 1 is much better than hand 2, fwiw.

[bilbo-san]

[ QUOTE ]
Hand 1) He's not really folding much of his range is he?

[/ QUOTE ]

Sure he is. His range is [censored] huge.

[TheChad]

hand 1 feels std at 200NL, but seems iffy here. I don't contest that you played it wrong by any means, but I'd feel sick about it.

hand 2 feels donkish pretty much the whole way. I'm sure it would work at higher levels, but I bet he seriously had your nuts.

[EvanJC]

no hand made sense for him to have in hand two. it was just a weird hand. he had an ace, fwiw, which really, really surprised me given how the hand went down.

[Trident]

Does anyone think a bit larger bet on the river might get a K to fold out? I can't see him folding with 2-1 odds, but maybe a raise to ~$60? Again, this might not work at NL100, but is someone at NL200 really going to fold a K here with these odds?

[snowbank]

[ QUOTE ]
I think hand 1 is much better than hand 2, fwiw.

[/ QUOTE ]

agreed

op, search: zeebo therom

[Trident]

[ QUOTE ]


op, search: zeebo therom

[/ QUOTE ]

Does anyone have a link to this in their favorites? I can't find a thread with this title in the last 3 years in SSNL...

[snowbank]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


op, search: zeebo therom

[/ QUOTE ]

Does anyone have a link to this in their favorites? I can't find a thread with this title in the last 3 years in SSNL...

[/ QUOTE ]

no one folds a full house is pretty much what it says

trying to bluff someone off at full house at $100nl is crazy, especially since A is way more likely than K for them in hand 2