|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Case in Point...
<font color="blue"> We can’t “own women”. What are the rules of atheism? </font>
No, but you can stone her to death on her doorstep upon learning she's not a virgin before you marry her. Are you sure about this? Don't you follow the God of Abraham? I thought giving away one's daughter was pretty routine in the biblical days. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Case in Point...
[ QUOTE ]
<font color="blue"> We can’t “own women”. What are the rules of atheism? </font> No, but you can stone her to death on her doorstep upon learning she's not a virgin before you marry her. Are you sure about this? Don't you follow the God of Abraham? I thought giving away one's daughter was pretty routine in the biblical days. [/ QUOTE ] The good ol’ days. Now we have political correctness. Anyway, my wife owns me and no one is coming to my rescue. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Case in Point...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] <font color="blue"> We can’t “own women”. What are the rules of atheism? </font> No, but you can stone her to death on her doorstep upon learning she's not a virgin before you marry her. Are you sure about this? Don't you follow the God of Abraham? I thought giving away one's daughter was pretty routine in the biblical days. [/ QUOTE ] The good ol’ days. Now we have political correctness. Anyway, my wife owns me and no one is coming to my rescue. [/ QUOTE ] LOL!! But seriously... How do you reconcile your current beliefs with such a passage? How do you think, "Well, that's BS, but this part is not,"? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Case in Point...
[ QUOTE ]
LOL!! But seriously... How do you reconcile your current beliefs with such a passage? How do you think, "Well, that's BS, but this part is not,"? [/ QUOTE ] It's the New Covenant. See, it used to be that murder and rape and stuff were cool. But God changed his mind. And if those morons are dumb enough to take God at his word? Well, gee. They should know that God changed his mind. Hope they enjoy the eternal barbecue. Along with us hedonistic devils with the good looks, right? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Case in Point...
[ QUOTE ]
Are you sure about this? Don't you follow the God of Abraham? I thought giving away one's daughter was pretty routine in the biblical days. [/ QUOTE ] The Bible's rife with this stuff. Ownership of women goes without saying. And when the Isrealites were done genociding, they took the leftover girls and made sex slaves out of them. Even Jesus is pretty clear that women are supposed to obey men. In general Jesus was pretty much against slavery, but his words could easily be interpreted to support it. Hell, it's easier to interpret Jesus as supporting slavery than it is to support Jesus as the compassionate messenger of a loving God. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Case in Point...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Are you sure about this? Don't you follow the God of Abraham? I thought giving away one's daughter was pretty routine in the biblical days. [/ QUOTE ] The Bible's rife with this stuff. Ownership of women goes without saying. And when the Isrealites were done genociding, they took the leftover girls and made sex slaves out of them. Even Jesus is pretty clear that women are supposed to obey men. In general Jesus was pretty much against slavery, but his words could easily be interpreted to support it. Hell, it's easier to interpret Jesus as supporting slavery than it is to support Jesus as the compassionate messenger of a loving God. [/ QUOTE ] Yet, he feels inadequate to opine on the Koran? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Case in Point...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Are you sure about this? Don't you follow the God of Abraham? I thought giving away one's daughter was pretty routine in the biblical days. [/ QUOTE ] The Bible's rife with this stuff. Ownership of women goes without saying. And when the Isrealites were done genociding, they took the leftover girls and made sex slaves out of them. Even Jesus is pretty clear that women are supposed to obey men. In general Jesus was pretty much against slavery, but his words could easily be interpreted to support it. Hell, it's easier to interpret Jesus as supporting slavery than it is to support Jesus as the compassionate messenger of a loving God. [/ QUOTE ] Yet, he feels inadequate to opine on the Koran? [/ QUOTE ] Are you implying he is not up to the task of opining on the Bible? What specifically do you take issue with? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Case in Point...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Are you sure about this? Don't you follow the God of Abraham? I thought giving away one's daughter was pretty routine in the biblical days. [/ QUOTE ] The Bible's rife with this stuff. Ownership of women goes without saying. And when the Isrealites were done genociding, they took the leftover girls and made sex slaves out of them. Even Jesus is pretty clear that women are supposed to obey men. In general Jesus was pretty much against slavery, but his words could easily be interpreted to support it. Hell, it's easier to interpret Jesus as supporting slavery than it is to support Jesus as the compassionate messenger of a loving God. [/ QUOTE ] Yet, he feels inadequate to opine on the Koran? [/ QUOTE ] Are you implying he is not up to the task of opining on the Bible? What specifically do you take issue with? [/ QUOTE ] The Jesus part. (He obviously is well versed in the Bible, though.) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Case in Point...
[ QUOTE ]
Yet, he feels inadequate to opine on the Koran? [/ QUOTE ] Not having read the Koran implies not having read the Bible now? The Christians are in trouble - then again, they never pay much attention anyhow. "Midianites? I've never heard of those." "Have you read the Bible?" "A bunch of times! It guides my life." |
|
|