Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-13-2007, 07:05 PM
Casper05 Casper05 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,566
Default Re: KK vs cold-calling TAG

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
snapcall

The 8 is a great card

[/ QUOTE ]
what, how? you think he had like Q5? i dont get it...

[/ QUOTE ]huh? he never has 2pr here. Its either a set, a Q, or 67...maybe 89/9T type hands sometimes.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-13-2007, 07:09 PM
Wolfram Wolfram is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Reykjavik
Posts: 3,306
Default Re: KK vs cold-calling TAG

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
snapcall

The 8 is a great card

[/ QUOTE ]
what, how? you think he had like Q5? i dont get it...

[/ QUOTE ]huh? he never has 2pr here. Its either a set, a Q, or 67...maybe 89/9T type hands sometimes.

[/ QUOTE ]
Still, it increases our equity from about 44% to about 47% if his range is only sets, big pairs or AQ. Not a big difference but it helps.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-13-2007, 07:10 PM
ikestoys ikestoys is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: I\'m not folding, stop bluffing
Posts: 5,642
Default Re: KK vs cold-calling TAG

[ QUOTE ]
Villain is 20/18-ish. The only time we've tangled before, he cold-called my late pos. TT open with AA from the blinds.

[/ QUOTE ]

wait, so he flatted AA OOP? and he's 20/18?? If he can show up with AA or QQ here I'd fold, but if he's repopping like he should, he has 55 or nothing and I call.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-13-2007, 07:10 PM
ikestoys ikestoys is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: I\'m not folding, stop bluffing
Posts: 5,642
Default Re: KK vs cold-calling TAG

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
snapcall

The 8 is a great card

[/ QUOTE ]
what, how? you think he had like Q5? i dont get it...

[/ QUOTE ]huh? he never has 2pr here. Its either a set, a Q, or 67...maybe 89/9T type hands sometimes.

[/ QUOTE ]

cuts down the number of 88s obv
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-13-2007, 07:11 PM
cs3 cs3 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: the shallow end
Posts: 2,737
Default Re: KK vs cold-calling TAG

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
snapcall

The 8 is a great card

[/ QUOTE ]
what, how? you think he had like Q5? i dont get it...

[/ QUOTE ]huh? he never has 2pr here. Its either a set, a Q, or 67...maybe 89/9T type hands sometimes.

[/ QUOTE ]
exaclty my point... so how is that 8 so awesome for us? and jsut becaue it reduces the combos of 88 from 3 to 1, isnt a good reason to jsutify calling instaed of folding. (and im not saying calling is necessarily bad, just that combos of 88 arent a a good reason to sway one way or the other)

anyway, especally given history about villains cold calling tendencies PF, i think folding the river is fine, becasue what worse hand can villain expecet HERO to have, that he can get any value out of whatsoever on the river?

name one hand in heros range that pays off vs AQ
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-13-2007, 07:12 PM
stickdude stickdude is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 913
Default Re: KK vs cold-calling TAG

This just doesn't feel like a set for some reason -

- A set will want to get it all in by the river (especially this deep) - he has barely over one PSB left on the river ($163 behind in a $153 pot), so why isn't he shoving the river?

- He has position and a fairly dry flop - why not wait until you fire a second barrel on the turn before raising - he can make a bigger raise and you'll be much more committed at that point.

I think I'd look him up and expect to see AQ here a decent percentage of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-13-2007, 07:12 PM
SamuraiJon SamuraiJon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: /noobs
Posts: 269
Default Re: KK vs cold-calling TAG

I really don't see someone over 200BB+ deep firing this hard with out a really big hand. AQ is a possibility but I sincerely doubt he's betting it this confident that he is a winner with these stacks.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-13-2007, 07:17 PM
Wolfram Wolfram is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Reykjavik
Posts: 3,306
Default Re: KK vs cold-calling TAG

[ QUOTE ]
so how is that 8 so awesome for us?

[/ QUOTE ]
I never said it was awesome, but it does help:

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

28 games 0.005 secs 5,600 games/sec

Board: Qd 8s 5h 7s 2d
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 44.643% 42.86% 01.79% 12 0.50 { KdKs }
Hand 1: 55.357% 53.57% 01.79% 15 0.50 { QQ+, 88, 55, AQs, AQo }


---

26 games 0.005 secs 5,200 games/sec

Board: Qd 8s 5h 7s 8d
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 48.077% 46.15% 01.92% 12 0.50 { KdKs }
Hand 1: 51.923% 50.00% 01.92% 13 0.50 { QQ+, 88, 55, AQs, AQo }


---
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-13-2007, 07:17 PM
bilbo-san bilbo-san is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In ur game, pickin off ur bluffz
Posts: 4,103
Default Re: KK vs cold-calling TAG

[ QUOTE ]
snapcall

The 8 is a great card

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-13-2007, 07:18 PM
cs3 cs3 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: the shallow end
Posts: 2,737
Default Re: KK vs cold-calling TAG

[ QUOTE ]
cs3,
why is c/c such a bad line on the turn? Because we miss value from Queens? I don't think he's calling 2 streets of value with AQ if we donk turn and bet river.

Or is it because you don't want to give a free card to a draw?

I'm assuming you're b/f-ing the turn then?

[/ QUOTE ]

i dont like your line becaue because he rarely if ever fires both turn and river with a AQ, but will almost always call both streets with AQ.
and yes, i think b/f > ch/r > c/c given how the hand has been played up to this point
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.