|
|
|
|
#1
11-17-2007, 01:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OES+FD DEEP 50NL vs Tough LAG.
Bah, I missed how deep we were here first time. Apologies. I think that makes a shove far less prudent tbh as the dead money is less significant in the EV calculation (even allowing that our FE probably goes up some when we shove).
Getting owned by a good LAG like this is horrible. But I cannot work out a remedy here: a smaller flop raise, a fold and a shove all seem questionable this deep. I wonder if a call mightn't be ok? Not sure if that's results-orientated though. 
|
|
#2
11-17-2007, 07:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OES+FD DEEP 50NL vs Tough LAG.
[ QUOTE ]
Getting owned by a good LAG like this is horrible. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think a good LAG is cold-calling here OOP w/86s not knowing what the other deepstack will do. Would a good LAG want to play a drawing hand like this OOP? Granted they are deep,but I'm not sure the implied odds make up for his 10bb preflop call when he has to play a multi-way 3bet pot OOP. He is c/f almost all flops.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
