Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-17-2007, 02:27 PM
Courtesy Flush Courtesy Flush is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 477
Default Argument with local B&M donks has me second guessing myself

I was playing at Oceans 11 last night when the following situation arose. I had two spewtards to my left who loved to raise trash pre-flop, so I limp/shoved with AQc and they both called me with 88 and K8. I missed the board and some old people at the other end of the table praised the 88 and commented on how "the best hand won." I know I shouldn't even say a word here, but I couldn't help myself and interjected that my hand was in fact best in that scenario. They all argued with me of course, but finally conceeded that I was ahead %-wise while still maintaining that 88 was the "best hand." I conintued to insist that AQc was the best hand because of the %, but they all agreed that 88 was "best" because of it's immediate ranking against AQ. This is when I realized we had different definitions of what makes the "best hand." I see where they are coming from, but it just doesn't seem right to me to label a hand that's behind as "best."

So my question is, what do you consider to be the "best" hand? The made hand or the one with the highest winning %?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-17-2007, 02:39 PM
ReptileHouse ReptileHouse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,203
Default Re: Argument with local B&M donks has me second guessing myself

For me, best = has the greatest equity. (i.e., pokerstove it)

That is not the common definition, though. Most people consider it to be the hand that would win "right now."

Similar arguments over semantics occur when you start talking about the definition of "being ahead."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-17-2007, 02:46 PM
jeffnc jeffnc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,631
Default Re: Argument with local B&M donks has me second guessing myself

[ QUOTE ]
Similar arguments over semantics occur when you start talking about the definition of "being ahead."

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, that one's a little trickier. "Being ahead" is often thought of as the percentage signs on the hands on TV.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-17-2007, 02:53 PM
AngusThermopyle AngusThermopyle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Riding Binky toward Ankh-Morpork
Posts: 4,366
Default Re: Argument with local B&M donks has me second guessing myself

If all the money is going in, the "best hand" is the one with the most equity. It doesn't matter if one hand is currently "ahead". You collect the pot after the River card, not before the Flop or on the Turn.

But even in your case, consider that AQc is a 47.6 to 52.4 dog vs 8h8d heads up.
What changes the numbers is the presence of the K8. So, if the K8 had mucked, and you were heads up, it would appear that the 88 was now the 'best hand', until you consider the dead cards (AQc is then a 53-47 favorite). But if you are going to do that, you have to ask everybody what they mucked.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-17-2007, 02:58 PM
Yads Yads is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,516
Default Re: Argument with local B&M donks has me second guessing myself

The best hand is the one that would win if no more cards were dealt.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-17-2007, 02:40 PM
Mano Mano is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 1,416
Default Re: Argument with local B&M donks has me second guessing myself

http://twodimes.net/h/?z=3114464
pokenum -h ac qc - kh 8h - 8c 8s
Holdem Hi: 1370754 enumerated boards
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Ac Qc 585806 42.74 780573 56.94 4375 0.32 0.428
Kh 8h 324724 23.69 1016516 74.16 29514 2.15 0.247
8s 8c 430710 31.42 910530 66.43 29514 2.15 0.324
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-17-2007, 07:11 PM
Biggle10 Biggle10 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: St Louis - Begging for 2-7
Posts: 716
Default Re: Argument with local B&M donks has me second guessing myself

[ QUOTE ]
http://twodimes.net/h/?z=3114464
pokenum -h ac qc - kh 8h - 8c 8s
Holdem Hi: 1370754 enumerated boards
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Ac Qc 585806 42.74 780573 56.94 4375 0.32 0.428
Kh 8h 324724 23.69 1016516 74.16 29514 2.15 0.247
8s 8c 430710 31.42 910530 66.43 29514 2.15 0.324

[/ QUOTE ]

How are people arguing that 88 is the best hand? Hold'em is played with 7 cards.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-19-2007, 03:43 AM
Albert Moulton Albert Moulton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Live Full Ring NLHE
Posts: 2,377
Default Re: Argument with local B&M donks has me second guessing myself

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
http://twodimes.net/h/?z=3114464
pokenum -h ac qc - kh 8h - 8c 8s
Holdem Hi: 1370754 enumerated boards
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Ac Qc 585806 42.74 780573 56.94 4375 0.32 0.428
Kh 8h 324724 23.69 1016516 74.16 29514 2.15 0.247
8s 8c 430710 31.42 910530 66.43 29514 2.15 0.324

[/ QUOTE ]

How are people arguing that 88 is the best hand? Hold'em is played with 7 cards.

[/ QUOTE ]

Looks like in this match up, AcQc is the best hand. Things change if you have to bet or call in installments on the flop, then the turn, then the river. But that's not the case here. AcQc is "best."

But I wouldn't argue with anybody at the table. You made a move. Two guys called without good pot odds relative to their hand equity. You had a positive expectation when the money went in, but you lost. Just say, "nice hand" and rebuy. If they really are bad players, then don't tap the glass.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-18-2007, 12:04 AM
CORed CORed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,798
Default Re: Argument with local B&M donks has me second guessing myself

<font class="small">Code:</font><hr /><pre>
Pokerstove results:

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

144,192,195 games 149.305 secs 965,755 games/sec

Board:
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 40.810% 40.52% 00.30% 58432109 429251.50 { 88 }
Hand 1: 41.133% 40.70% 00.44% 58693360 633339.00 { AQs }
Hand 2: 18.057% 17.43% 00.63% 25131604 913076.50 { random }
</pre><hr />

Three-way, against a random third hand, AQs is a little bit ahead of 88 . This is a Monte Carlo, so the numbers aren't exact, but they're close.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-18-2007, 06:51 AM
Rek Rek is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London
Posts: 747
Default Re: Argument with local B&M donks has me second guessing myself

I can't believe some of you guys are arguing - the best hand is the hand with the highest % of winning once all cards are dealt.

I havn't done the math but in this case if AQs has a greater % of winning it is clearly the best hand. The fact that he already has a pair is of no consequence.

OP, I'm with you 100%
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.