|
|
#11
06-11-2007, 10:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KK UB 200k
[ QUOTE ]
I think flat calling to keep the BB around is way too fancy and I think it's just bad to be honest. [/ QUOTE ] Its going to cost the BB 615 more to call PF which is currently 25% of your stack, that's not insignificant. It also inflates the pot enough to basically guarantee that the CO will jam the flop when checked to. Jamming PF may lose some hands that stack off on the flop. Yes you *may* lose some of those hand on the flop, but with the pot that big I really doubt the PFR just c/f any flop, but jams > 90% of them. Regards, Woodguy 
|
|
#12
06-11-2007, 11:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KK UB 200k
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think flat calling to keep the BB around is way too fancy and I think it's just bad to be honest. [/ QUOTE ] Its going to cost the BB 615 more to call PF which is currently 25% of your stack, that's not insignificant. It also inflates the pot enough to basically guarantee that the CO will jam the flop when checked to. Jamming PF may lose some hands that stack off on the flop. Yes you *may* lose some of those hand on the flop, but with the pot that big I really doubt the PFR just c/f any flop, but jams > 90% of them. Regards, Woodguy [/ QUOTE ] I dunno man I just really really don't like it, and think its huge FPS or whatever they call it.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
