nudity/ porn: what's allowed to be linked?

[Smell The Glove]

What's 2p2's policy on how filthy a linked image can be? I'm not talking about inline pictures (especially since the policy on that seems to vary between forums). It's my understanding that 2p2 has a policy against linking to images of "hardcore" porn.... OK I guess I don't really know what's meant by hardcore. Obviously really sick stuff like bestiality, etc.... and penetration is probably included in that. In bbv4l Dids' inline porn rule applies to all nudity (even paintings of Mary Magdalene). I'm pretty sure that linking to a picture of a Playboy-type nude image is OK, since I've seen it done on 2p2 a million times. I guess I'm just wondering how far that policy extends.

I pm'ed Dids about this the other day, but haven't gotten a response yet. Specifically what I was asking him about was whether it was OK to post an image of a naked woman, who was tied up, and another woman was touching her vagina. It wasn't all close up and nasty or anything... it was a long shot and pretty tasteful imo. (This was in the context of a thread on the appreciation of "robust women," btw.)

Any clarification on what's allowed and not allowed to be linked would be fantastic. oh yeah, also I should note that the image links would include NSFW tags, obviously.

[Georgia Avenue]

PM LINK SILVER PLATE

[iron81]

The site-wide minimium is something like this:

inline stuff with boobs and vag covered up (either by blanking or hands covering or whatever): ok if thread is labelled nsfw.

links to uncensored boobs and vag shots labelled nsfw: ok

BUT links to naked possibly underage chicks photobucket accounts who can sue us: not ok

links to any type of porn (guy on girl, guy on guy, girl on girl, whatever) or any porn inline: not ok

links to porn sites: not ok

However, I understand that Dids has elected to implement a stricter policy in BBV4L.

[jsbjoe]

this thread is no good without pics/link

[Mike Haven]

It's probably rather an intangible line in many respects, and certainly virtually impossible to define adequately.

The best way to think about is perhaps with the old "would a reasonable person think this is appropriate and acceptable in these circumstances with this wide audience of men and women probably aged 16 and above" question.

If you question yourself as to whether or not you should post it, you probably shouldn't. If you do decide to post something you feel to be on the line, it might be better to give a short (not graphic) description along with the NSFW label.

[Los Feliz Slim]

Perfect OP screen-name of the day award.

[tuq]

Here is a NSFW pic of Mike Haven in a bikini:

[Conspire]

Is that a speedo?



Conspire

[durron597]

MikeHavenandjaredlareright

I would add that the restrictions are in general significantly less strict in threads labeled NSFW than ones that are not.

[Suigin406]

tub, was that the image that won mike haven the swimsuit competition??

also, this the 2nd day in a row now i've had to think of mods in smimsuits while eating chiptole