|
|
#21
11-21-2007, 01:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How many BB/100Hands are considerd good?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 2BB/100 good 3BB/100 great 4BB/100 outstanding and only sustainable by the best [/ QUOTE ] This is slightly off topic, but I'll throw this out there since it's higher than most people think is sustainable for a multitabler. At nl200 (including a couple thousand hands at pl200) I've been keeping up 6.66 ptBB/100 over my last 117K hands with a multitable ratio over 8 [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] been running pretty hot, should settle to closer to 5.5 I'm guessing (also these days my MT ratio stays around 11). Anyone with this kind of winrate should probably move up (myself included) but I prefer playing tons of tables and keep up good table selection instead... a lot less stressful than when I used to play higher. One day in the next six months or so when I stop making my living from poker I plan on making a post with PT screenshots and detailed descriptions of my nl200 game. [/ QUOTE ] Crash coming. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] BTW, 100k hands really not that big of a sample in NL. 
|
|
#24
11-21-2007, 01:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How many BB/100Hands are considerd good?
[ QUOTE ]
BTW, 100k hands really not that big of a sample in NL. [/ QUOTE ] Yea, I know. FWIW currently have a standard deviation of 1.14 ptBB/100 on that winrate... not entirely unlikely my "true" winrate is more like 4ptBB/100.
|
|
#28
11-21-2007, 01:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How many BB/100Hands are considerd good?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] FWIW currently have a standard deviation of 1.14 ptBB/100 on that winrate [/ QUOTE ] No you don't. [/ QUOTE ]was good for an lol though. I thought 1.14 would be impossible but I guess I could be wrong.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
