|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Life Cycle of a Poker Player (and my thoughts on live vs online)
So your saying Brian Townsend has peaked?
awesome post btw. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Life Cycle of a Poker Player (and my thoughts on live vs onlin
[ QUOTE ]
So your saying Brian Townsend has peaked? [/ QUOTE ] Whats hes saying is that a player who dedicates them self to playing optimally from as early as possible will peak at 24, Brian has put nowhere near that kind of effort into his play and is still developing. Also, I think that top chess players are better at chess than basically anyone is at anything, and I don't think poker will be that way any time soon. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Life Cycle of a Poker Player (and my thoughts on live vs onlin
brandon adams and kenny tran are both DOWN money playing online...if you cant win online you shouldnt be putting yourself in a category above online. While there may be an added element to play live (an element barry greenstein says is widely overrated), online is very straight up and real poker and neither player is successful there. this makes their credibility in discussing the top players quite iffy.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Life Cycle of a Poker Player (and my thoughts on live vs onlin
[ QUOTE ]
brandon adams and kenny tran are both DOWN money playing online...if you cant win online you shouldnt be putting yourself in a category above online. While there may be an added element to play live (an element barry greenstein says is widely overrated), online is very straight up and real poker and neither player is successful there. this makes their credibility in discussing the top players quite iffy. [/ QUOTE ] You don't have to have cancer to research/analyze/understand it...even if what you're saying is really true...which I'm not really corroborating. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Life Cycle of a Poker Player (and my thoughts on live vs onlin
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] brandon adams and kenny tran are both DOWN money playing online...if you cant win online you shouldnt be putting yourself in a category above online. While there may be an added element to play live (an element barry greenstein says is widely overrated), online is very straight up and real poker and neither player is successful there. this makes their credibility in discussing the top players quite iffy. [/ QUOTE ] You don't have to have cancer to research/analyze/understand it...even if what you're saying is really true...which I'm not really corroborating. [/ QUOTE ] Well actually, in some ways, you do...since chess has been brought up...if no one kept track of results of chess players, who would you trust in telling you who the best players are? Kasparov who beat everyone he played? Or me, a decent player who studied the game? Am I in the position to determine who is the best? No, because if I knew what it meant to be the best, I would be the best. So, to claim you can assess who is best, without basing it on raw numbers, but on your observations as a player who can't win online yourself, credibility is lacking. And btw, according to the rough estimates of high stakes database...Brandon adams is down big in holdem and in omaha...i am not saying he can't make judgements, but his assessments of who is who and what is what are really not that meaningful since he doesn't play poker as well as many online players. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Life Cycle of a Poker Player (and my thoughts on live vs onlin
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] brandon adams and kenny tran are both DOWN money playing online...if you cant win online you shouldnt be putting yourself in a category above online. While there may be an added element to play live (an element barry greenstein says is widely overrated), online is very straight up and real poker and neither player is successful there. this makes their credibility in discussing the top players quite iffy. [/ QUOTE ] You don't have to have cancer to research/analyze/understand it...even if what you're saying is really true...which I'm not really corroborating. [/ QUOTE ] Well actually, in some ways, you do...since chess has been brought up...if no one kept track of results of chess players, who would you trust in telling you who the best players are? Kasparov who beat everyone he played? Or me, a decent player who studied the game? Am I in the position to determine who is the best? No, because if I knew what it meant to be the best, I would be the best. So, to claim you can assess who is best, without basing it on raw numbers, but on your observations as a player who can't win online yourself, credibility is lacking. [/ QUOTE ] Assessment and practice need not be mutually inclusive in the realm of understanding...and they're definately not exhaustive... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Life Cycle of a Poker Player (and my thoughts on live vs onlin
I for one enjoyed the article. Thanks
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Life Cycle of a Poker Player (and my thoughts on live vs onlin
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] brandon adams and kenny tran are both DOWN money playing online...if you cant win online you shouldnt be putting yourself in a category above online. While there may be an added element to play live (an element barry greenstein says is widely overrated), online is very straight up and real poker and neither player is successful there. this makes their credibility in discussing the top players quite iffy. [/ QUOTE ] You don't have to have cancer to research/analyze/understand it...even if what you're saying is really true...which I'm not really corroborating. [/ QUOTE ] Well actually, in some ways, you do...since chess has been brought up...if no one kept track of results of chess players, who would you trust in telling you who the best players are? Kasparov who beat everyone he played? Or me, a decent player who studied the game? Am I in the position to determine who is the best? No, because if I knew what it meant to be the best, I would be the best. So, to claim you can assess who is best, without basing it on raw numbers, but on your observations as a player who can't win online yourself, credibility is lacking. [/ QUOTE ] Assessment and practice need not be mutually inclusive in the realm of understanding...and they're definately not exhaustive... [/ QUOTE ] For years, Indiana University had the best college swimming program in the country. Their coach could not swim. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Life Cycle of a Poker Player (and my thoughts on live vs onlin
Very nice article Brandon. I agree in two or three years we will see an evolution in poker as these young guys who have known nothing else but playing poker 24/7 aided by tools such as 2+2, poker tracker, poker training sites, etc. mature. It's going to be scary.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Life Cycle of a Poker Player (and my thoughts on live vs onlin
Playing devil's advocate here, the online game is dominated by midstack poker where analysis and early street decision making dominates the play. Brandon was pretty clear that the online players have the strongest skills in these areas right now. Saying that these two players aren't winning online players doesn't discredit his argument at all. It is his argument.
|
|
|