|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bankroll Management: Low Stakes
I think you can modify these based on a few other factors, how many tables you play and what style you play.
A laggy style playing 6+ tables needs a a much deeper roll then a 4 table tag... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bankroll Management: Low Stakes
a lot of people think "moving up" means abandoning the previous level entirely and jumping to the new one. there's no shame in mixing tables and levels, or say you move up from 25 to 50, and the 50 tables suck one night, to sit at a few of them and then more of the 25s if the 25s are better. a bigger winrate at a lower game will be more profitable than a tiny winrate or a regfest at a higher game.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bankroll Management: Low Stakes
[ QUOTE ]
For example, lets take the 50NL example and someone 8-tables. When you get to $1,500 and feel comfortable, add a table of 100NL into your mix when you play and if you keep grinding out a profit, slowly add more tables until eventually you are at your baseline for the next level and are plaiying that level almost exclusively. [/ QUOTE ] This was my plan. I ended up winning at 25NL while losing at 50NL. Small sample size so this may have been purely coincidence, but it was enough to convince me the games are sufficiently different that playing both at once isn't a great idea for me. Now I intend to stick with 25NL 'til I hit $1800 then switch to $50NL wholesale. This means I won't play a level without at least 36 BI. In my case, this is *not* about protecting from a downswing wiping the bankroll out (I think my game is comfortably low enough variance to be playing 50NL already with my current roll), it is about protecting my mental health. The downswings on a horrible session look far less severe. I can literally sleep better at night! |
|
|