Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: WR (3)
Holt v Sea 13 34.21%
Welker @ NYJ 6 15.79%
Furrey v Buf 4 10.53%
Boldin v Chi 6 15.79%
Rod Smith v Oakland 6 15.79%
Colston v Phi 3 7.89%
Voters: 38. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #18  
Old 09-12-2007, 06:18 PM
El_Hombre_Grande El_Hombre_Grande is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: On another hopeless bluff.
Posts: 1,091
Default Re: Please change the FAQ on bankroll requirements.

Many of the posters here are responding as though anecdotal rumor trumps math. It doesn't. Undoubtedly Pzhon is correct. The real answer is a) bankroll requirements assume that you are a winning player (a dubious assumption for most) and b) the amount of a sufficient bankroll depends on a number of interrelated factors: your proven winrate, standard deviation, and tolerance for risk.

I would agree that the FAQ could be more much more "correct" by explaining this analysis. But I think it would be a shame also if a newbie couldn't leave the FAQ with a reasonably solid and useful answer as opposed to a "it depends." If all its going to do is theorize, its not really a useful FAQ. 20 is in some sense "wrong," as Pzhon points out, but its not nearly as "wrong" as many of the ideas that can float around in a newbie's head.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.