annoying spot with the nuts.

[Claunchy]

[ QUOTE ]
if i bet 30 on turn im getting 3:1 on his river stack. pot will be 140 hell have 70

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, but if the river is Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] and he shoves, he has to have a FH/flush like 100% right? A lone A would definitely check imo.

I mean, it's exploitable as hell, but seems unlikely to ever be exploited. And I can't see shoving (never get called by worse) or c/c'ing (get boned by better hands 90%, split 10%, yes those percentages are totally made up) being any better. I could be wrong. That would be a sick spot.

[the machine]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
if i bet 30 on turn im getting 3:1 on his river stack. pot will be 140 hell have 70

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, but if the river is Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] and he shoves, he has to have a FH/flush like 100% right? A lone A would definitely check imo.

I mean, it's exploitable as hell, but seems unlikely to ever be exploited. And I can't see shoving (never get called by worse) or c/c'ing (get boned by better hands 90%, split 10%, yes those percentages are totally made up) being any better. I could be wrong. That would be a sick spot.

[/ QUOTE ]

well hes in position so hes not open shoving. id have to check it to him and he may make that shove with a lone ace figuring my weak turn bet as a blff now checking a bad river, and id feel obligated to call.

meh this sounds like im asking for advice then saying how i dont like the line. im really not trying to come off like that, just playing devlis advocate and debating the line

[rand]

35-45

[Claunchy]

Nah, you're fine. I was just sorta thinking out loud (or whatever the internet is).

I knew he was in position, but I still am not sure an A would shove that river when he's basically only getting called by splits (that he would never think would fold) and better hands. No way a counterfeited KJ/KT ever calls even getting those odds imo.