#1
|
|||
|
|||
Post deleted by Mat Sklansky
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 53 hands seen 0 pots won
Dude, this is a pathetic record. 53 hands? Are you effing joking? Try going 5 hours live.
-Michael |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Post deleted by Mat Sklansky
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 53 hands seen 0 pots won
53 hands is like the normal interval between winning hands for me [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 53 hands seen 0 pots won
[ QUOTE ]
53 hands is like the normal interval between winning hands for me [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I'm so jealous [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 53 hands seen 0 pots won
I once had a 1 for 162 streak when I played lolmit
I don't play lolmit anymore though |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 53 hands seen 0 pots won
you're sample is too big...
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 53 hands seen 0 pots won
[ QUOTE ]
you're sample is too big... [/ QUOTE ] the one time someone throws an apostrophe into "youre" and its way, way wrong. will anyone ever get this right? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 53 hands seen 0 pots won
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Dude, this is a pathetic record. 53 hands? Are you effing joking? Try going 5 hours live. -Michael [/ QUOTE ] Okay since you mention it!..lol [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] Live 10-20 I played 5hrs and 10 minutes, and never won a hand. [/ QUOTE ] This thread is pointless. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 53 hands seen 0 pots won
[ QUOTE ]
will anyone ever get this right? [/ QUOTE ] Know, they wont evar |
|
|