|
|
#61
11-02-2007, 03:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LC - Why don\'t you play 6 max ?
u NEED to learn to play 6max. 6max = up profits!!!
more hands/hr more decisions/hr = more profitable situations vs donks the only time i like to hear an excuse of playing full ring is if ur playing high stakes in which the shorthanded games are unbelievably tough (esp on stars =_=) 
|
|
#63
11-02-2007, 04:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LC - Why don\'t you play 6 max ?
[ QUOTE ]
u NEED to learn to play 6max. 6max = up profits!!! more hands/hr more decisions/hr = more profitable situations vs donks the only time i like to hear an excuse of playing full ring is if ur playing high stakes in which the shorthanded games are unbelievably tough (esp on stars =_=) [/ QUOTE ] More hands per hour is not really an issue anymore. Come back to me when 1 hand every 3 seconds is not enough.
|
|
#65
11-02-2007, 06:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LC - Why don\'t you play 6 max ?
[ QUOTE ]
Is it possible to be sucessful at both games at the same time? Like it I was a medium stakes player Id want to be able to pick the best games wether they be FR or 6max. [/ QUOTE ] yes, it is. I do it some, Soah does it even more than me i believe. Also the whole LAG/TAG debate is pretty pointless. I personally have looser PF numbers at FR tables than at 6-max
|
|
#66
11-02-2007, 06:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LC - Why don\'t you play 6 max ?
[ QUOTE ]
Also the whole LAG/TAG debate is pretty pointless. I personally have looser PF numbers at FR tables than at 6-max [/ QUOTE ] u srs? i was a nit at 6max and still ran 25/18...
|
|
#67
11-02-2007, 06:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LC - Why don\'t you play 6 max ?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Also the whole LAG/TAG debate is pretty pointless. I personally have looser PF numbers at FR tables than at 6-max [/ QUOTE ] u srs? i was a nit at 6max and still ran 25/18... [/ QUOTE ] well i guess it depends on the stakes. i would probably play very very loose at a small stakes 6-max table but at 3/6+ im pretty sick tight in EP at a 6M table b/c so many of the regs are extremely good at punishing you for playing OOP. Im about 23/19 at 6max and 25/20 at FR filtering for 7+ players.
|
|
#68
11-02-2007, 06:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LC - Why don\'t you play 6 max ?
well yea...when i play smaller, i open up quite a bit (even at FR, my difference between 100 and 50 is huge)...so i think thats standard
and it makes sense that ur shuttin ur OOP range down against better positional opponents...only makes sense. (how many tables u playin and still able to maintain 25/20 at FR? i 12table and cant seem to do better than 16/9 (not that i wanna get into a "what stats are optimal" convo...just askin))
|
|
#69
11-02-2007, 07:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LC - Why don\'t you play 6 max ?
i usually play 6-8 tables at a time, whatever tables look softest to me but usually at least 4 of them are 6M.
|
|
#70
11-02-2007, 08:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: LC - Why don\'t you play 6 max ?
good for u for being able to do FR+6m in the same sesh. i cant even do MTT+cash at the same time (brain wont allow me to play small BB poker on table, and 100BB on another...stupid brain). so i guess playyin both disciplines at the same time wud allow u to run those stats at FR pretty nicely.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
