fair play

gregesry · #1 11-02-2007, 03:57 PM

Currently their is no method to guarantee "fair play" for virtual casinos.
Bricks and mortar (Las Vegas type) casinos have Gaming Commissions. Here is an example of the problem.
Difference between a land based slot machine and a virtual slot.
Land based slot can not change. The electronics,software and machine are physically present at casino. A gaming commissioner can test any machine at any casino at any time. This gives a "Chance" of discovering a casino tampering with an approved gaming device.
Virtual Casinos do not physically exists. At present their is no "True" regulation. The software providers have psuedo-regulatory organizations and gaming commissions. None of these psuedo-regulatory organizations do anonymous random testing of the virtual games they are said to regulate.
The United States can not be expected to let its citizens be defrauded by Entity's residing in a trading partners jurisdiction.

The United States has no responsibility for proving that "fair play" exists outside its jurisdiction. By definition a virtual casino game can not be tested physically. It is the responsibility of the virtual casino industry have "true" regulation. At present Antigua and Barbados have no requirements for random,anonymous and independent testing of their virtual casinos. Virtual casinos in their jurisdiction can defraud U.S. Citizens of billions of dollars annually.

RioGossiper · #2 11-02-2007, 04:36 PM

[ QUOTE ]

The United States has no responsibility for proving that "fair play" exists outside its jurisdiction. By definition a virtual casino game can not be tested physically. It is the responsibility of the virtual casino industry have "true" regulation. At present Antigua and Barbados have no requirements for random,anonymous and independent testing of their virtual casinos. Virtual casinos in their jurisdiction can defraud U.S. Citizens of billions of dollars annually.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is false. They have strict and robust regulations in line with the laws of Gibralter.

But even if it were true US citizens could be defrauded by Antigua, the federal reserve in partnership with the executive administration of the US are already doing a far better job of hoodwinking americans by achieving hyper-inflation.

Maybe it is so they can afford to pay out in a case they know they can't win?

HeroInBlack · #3 11-02-2007, 04:36 PM

There is no guarantee that the government is treating you fairly. There is no guarantee that your wife is treating you fairly. There is no guarantee that your insurance company is treating you fairly. There is no guarantee that God is treating you fairly. There is no guarantee that your church is treating you fairly.

We all just go on our experiences and make our best judgments about each of these. Thank you for your concern.

gregesry · #4 11-02-2007, 08:55 PM

Their is abosolutely no type of regulation. No random testing. No verifiable protocol that can establish pay back percentage.
Maybe these issues are a little too complicated to discuss in this forum

gregesry · #5 11-02-2007, 09:14 PM

No jurisdiction has in place Regulations or requirements that use anonymous random accounts for the purpose of producing payback percentage reports.
I know Mr. Skylanski understands or can sees A problem.
A virtual casino does not exists physicaly.

Payback % reports produced without use of anonymous accounts have no real world value. If the casino knows account is being used for payback % evaluation they will not cheat that account.

Restox2 · #6 11-02-2007, 11:34 PM

I hear what your saying but your gonna get flamed and possibbly banned for a post like this. Pretty much no one here believes poker could be rigged in anyway, I guess the AP opened there eyes a little but but if there were proof today that it was rigged in some way..half the people wouldnt believe and the other half wouldnt care.