Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-22-2007, 03:04 PM
Runn233 Runn233 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 74
Default Pot Size and Bluffing

I've been debating about this for quite some time. According to TOP, Sklansky says it's not usually correct to bluff when the pot is big because, given the pot odds, your opponent will call automatically.

I read one of Ed Miller's post about how you SHOULD bluff when the pot is big because it is worth risking one more bet, and it is no different than calling a bet from your opponent because you would have done that anyway.

I can see both arguments are plausible, but which one is better? Don't bluff or risk a bet?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-22-2007, 09:58 PM
RufiloCaptn RufiloCaptn is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 8
Default Re: Pot Size and Bluffing

I'd risk making a bluff in many instances. Bluffing would probably increase the likelihood of winning the pot instead of checking down, as your foe could fold. It really depends if you plan on staying in the pot until the end.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-23-2007, 01:30 AM
saefrog saefrog is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4
Default Re: Pot Size and Bluffing

It really depends on whether this is cash game, limit, or tournament. And if tournament how big is the pot in relation to your stack size etc. Too limited information to give a good response. In general I would have to agree with RufiloCaptn.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-23-2007, 02:30 AM
Cody1982 Cody1982 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 65
Default Re: Pot Size and Bluffing

IMO it also depends on your table image and you also have to consider the action leading up to the decsion(who raised pre-flop...etc}. I would use other information along wit pot size to decide if the bluff is +EV or not.I wouldnt have a set rule for these types of situations. Play the player.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-23-2007, 02:59 AM
pzhon pzhon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,515
Default Re: Pot Size and Bluffing

[ QUOTE ]
I've been debating about this for quite some time. According to TOP, Sklansky says it's not usually correct to bluff when the pot is big because, given the pot odds, your opponent will call automatically.

I read one of Ed Miller's post about how you SHOULD bluff when the pot is big because it is worth risking one more bet, and it is no different than calling a bet from your opponent because you would have done that anyway.

I can see both arguments are plausible, but which one is better? Don't bluff or risk a bet?

[/ QUOTE ]
If you are in position, the TOP argument more correctly describes the theoretical optimum. However, if your opponents do not correctly adjust their calling ranges to the size of the pot, then bluffing more frequently may be right in practice.

Blocking bets, bets made out of position instead of checking and then calling, are more complicated. The difference between taking a bet/fold (or bet/call) line and a check-call line may be getting value from weaker hands, not bluffing out stronger hands, even if the bet is made with hands that are behind on average when called. It is easier to make value bets when the pot is large, and a larger pot may favor blocking bets. Other factors may dominate.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.