|
View Poll Results: Who wins the 2006 Sports Illustrated Sportsman of the Year Award? | |||
Billy Donovan | 1 | 1.67% | |
Vince Young | 2 | 3.33% | |
Italy's WC Team | 1 | 1.67% | |
Bill Cowher | 0 | 0% | |
Roger Federer | 11 | 18.33% | |
Dwayne Wade | 5 | 8.33% | |
Tony La Russa | 1 | 1.67% | |
Paul Tagliabue | 2 | 3.33% | |
George Mason men's bb team | 4 | 6.67% | |
Tiger Woods | 28 | 46.67% | |
"Game of Shadows" writers | 3 | 5.00% | |
Other | 2 | 3.33% | |
Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#471
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
[ QUOTE ]
why are u guys not listing the names also ? here's what I got: and yes, one of those negative players is oneof the bots. LOLOL [/ QUOTE ] it's just sorta bad manner to display people's winnings or losings publicly. Wow, you have a huge sample size, is this overall? i only posted this months* |
#472
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
it's probably 3 months or so
|
#473
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
is 200NL much more difficult then 100NL in general? I think im probably moving up soon.
|
#474
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
i havent played NL100 for a long time so I wouldnt know [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
#475
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
[ QUOTE ]
is 200NL much more difficult then 100NL in general? I think im probably moving up soon. [/ QUOTE ] on stars its a pretty significant jump, not sure about FT |
#476
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
Ryan;
It isn't IMO, the only difference is you have to actually pay attention to your opponents instead of just playing robotic. I guess this is a big jump but it is something you should be practicing regardless. So if you are playing bad and robotic at 100nl then yes 200nl is a big jump, but otherwise you should do fine [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#477
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
I recently moved from 100 to 200 - only 5k hds at 200, I only get in 12k or so a month. IMO, the biggest difference on full tilt is the preflop aggression. Play doesn't seem that different otherwise.
Probably beaten to death on this board somewhere but I'm asking anyway: why does everyone call mariojr, 0_drunkenboxer, etc. bots? I've chatted with mariojr on more than one occasion and I think I've seen some chat out of drunkenboxer as well. Clearly not bots or am I missing something? Just calling them bots because of their ABC play? |
#478
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
Because mario_jr drunkenboxer etc play in a sort of "poker sweatshop" where they all sit together 12 tabling robotically for many hours in a day. They also split profits I think
|
#479
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
Those sample sizes are too small as far to determine who is a long term winner and loser. It does show however that the game plays nitty.
|
#480
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
[ QUOTE ]
Wow, I wonder who's #3 in your list. [/ QUOTE ] I will guess Narena, if we are guessing. |
|
|