Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Poker > Omaha/8

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-17-2007, 07:32 PM
Jimbotbs Jimbotbs is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 15
Default [LO8] Two Pair in HU-Pot

Full Tilt Poker
Limit Omaha Hi/Lo Ring game
Limit: $2/$4
9 players
Converter

Pre-flop: (9 players) Hero is CO with 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
5 folds, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises</font>, Button calls, 2 folds.

Flop: 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (5.5SB, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Button raises</font>, Hero calls.

Turn: A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (4.75BB, 2 players)
Hero checks, <font color="#cc0000">Button bets</font>, Hero calls.

River: 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (6.75BB, 2 players)
Hero checks, Button checks.

Results:
Final pot: 6.75BB

Villain was tight-aggressive.

Preflop: I raise to take the blinds because the table was tight. Should I have just called?

Flop: Standard?

Turn: I made two pair and decide to call him down.

Opinions?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-17-2007, 09:01 PM
Big Dave D Big Dave D is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,151
Default Re: [LO8] Two Pair in HU-Pot

Standard.

gl

bdd
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-17-2007, 10:50 PM
Rainshine Rainshine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Greenville NC
Posts: 130
Default Re: [LO8] Two Pair in HU-Pot

seems pretty standard to me, specially for being OOP
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-18-2007, 07:02 AM
Buzz Buzz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: L.A.
Posts: 3,633
Default Re: [LO8] Two Pair in HU-Pot

[ QUOTE ]
Preflop: I raise to take the blinds because the table was tight. Should I have just called?

[/ QUOTE ]Hi Jim - You raise hoping to steal the blinds and win three bucks? My problem with that line of reasoning is I think your starting hand is worth more than three bucks in a $2/$4 game.

Still, your tactics would have worked out better for you if you'd had better luck with Button folding and then better luck with the cards of the flop. (And the result, whatever it was, could hardly have been disastrous for you, but maybe the result was a bit unsettling in that you realize it was not optimal).

Your starting hand is well above average, certainly good enough to raise before the flop. In another situation I might raise before the flop with it. However, in general, I would not raise before the flop with this hand. Instead, I'd want to keep as many opponents as possible in the hand with me.

In some other poker games limping with a hand strong enough to raise would be termed "slow playing." However that is not the best perspective to have when limping before the flop in Omaha-8. Instead, think of limping with this type of starting hand in Omaha-8 as "pulling." (I think that gives it a different, better, perspective).

An interesting love/hate aspect of Omaha-8 is everything can suddenly change. After the flop or after the turn, the fit can be such that this starting hand will need all the protection it can get, or you may want to promote your nut high or low into a scooper. At that point your hand will abruptly metamorphose into a pushing hand.

After the flop this starting hand will probably continue to be a pulling hand. But it may become a pushing hand. Hard to say without knowing the flop.

At any rate, before the flop, this starting hand is definitely a "pulling" hand. Indeed, most good Omaha-8 starting hands are "pulling" hands. And that is an aspect of starting hands regular Texas hold 'em players, even very successful ones, do not seem to understand.

You could be at a table where your opponents are gambling fools and unable to read your cards - and then it would make good sense to raise before the flop, even with a pulling hand.

But although it's hard to judge on the basis of only one hand, that does not seem to be the case here.

You should want to pull as many opponents into the action as possible.

Why is this hand a "pulling" hand, rather than a "pushing" hand? Because this hand will often make the nuts on the river, and even when it doesn't make the nuts, you will often end up with a winning non-nut hand.<ul type="square">• You have a suited ace, the nuts if the board flushes in your suit.
• You have the nut low if the board on the river has three low ranks without aces or deuces.
• If you make a straight it will tend to be the nut straight.
• If the board pairs and you make a full house, it will tend to beat an opponent's full house.
• If the board pairs and you don't make a full house, your trip jacks, trip tens, or trip deuces will beat those of an opponent who also ends up with trips and doesn't have an ace kicker.
• Your two pairs will tend to be better than an opponent's two pairs, if nobody has better than two pairs. (Happens a lot more than some apparently think).[/list]Bottom line: Instead of chasing people out and stealing the blinds, you should want potential customers who will end up holding non-nut hands and who will end up paying you off when you end up with a winner.

[ QUOTE ]
Flop: Standard?

[/ QUOTE ]For a full game, or even for several opponents seeing the flop, you missed a good enough flop fit to continue.

However here you only have one opponent and the flop is high. If you think your one opponent may not have much of a fit either, it makes some sense to take a stab at the pot.

But if you bet because you thought your hand/flop fit is better than your opponent's hand/flop fit, be aware there are lots of ways your opponent could have a better hand/flop fit and in addition, your opponent has position on you. And be aware that your opponent probably will know full well that you realize a good fit with this particular flop is less likely than with various other possible flops and that you might be doing exactly what you seem to be doing - taking a stab at the pot.

At any rate, you bet this flop, your opponent raises, and you're more or less screwed. You don't have much of a flop fit yourself (whether you realize it or not), but you can't tell if your opponent has a better flop fit or not (and you don't know if he realizes it or not). And since now there are 8.75 small bets in the pot and it will only cost you one small bet to see the turn, you call the raise.

You cannot like the way things have gone for you thus far. By raising your flop bet, your opponent may be executing the first step in a "free card" play. That's more of a Texas hold 'em ploy than an Omaha-8 ploy, but sometimes I see it and sometimes I use it myself in Omaha-8 play.
[ QUOTE ]
Turn: I made two pair and decide to call him down.

[/ QUOTE ]You actually should like the turn, but are afraid your opponent raised on the flop because he has a AKYZ, or possibly because he has QJYZ. So you check, planning to call your opponent down.

And then your opponent checks behind you, perhaps successfully executing the second step of a "free card" play. Or maybe Villain is simply playing coy, hoping to get a bet out of you on the river.

After the way you played the first betting round, you end up betting when you don't have a bet and checking when you do. Ironic, isn't it.

Buzz
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-18-2007, 08:22 AM
Olrik Olrik is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 90
Default Re: [LO8] Two Pair in HU-Pot

a few thoughts about the preflop raise:

my pto tells me that i make 0.4 BB/hand with any A2 hand. now even if i take into account that a) i dont have a really large sample size b) suck at o8 and c) OPs A2 hand is well above the average A2 hand i think wining 0.75 BB by just taking the blinds seems to be a good result.

while i understand the idea of pushing vs pulling hands (or at least i try to) i would argue that with everyone folding to us in late position we need some kind of standard action with any hand we want to play. openlimping the pullings hands and raising the pushing hands makes it easy for villians to read us (basicly like only raising with strong AA and A2 hands). assuming you follow my reasoning we are down to
a) openraising any hand we want to play
b) openlimp any hand we want to play
c) openlimp the pulling hands and fold playable pushing hands

this might be holdem mentality but dont we open up our range in o8 depending on position too?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-18-2007, 09:08 AM
I-Love-Poker I-Love-Poker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: I Just Love Poker
Posts: 120
Default Re: [LO8] Two Pair in HU-Pot

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Preflop: I raise to take the blinds because the table was tight. Should I have just called?

[/ QUOTE ]Hi Jim - You raise hoping to steal the blinds and win three bucks? My problem with that line of reasoning is I think your starting hand is worth more than three bucks in a $2/$4 game.

Still, your tactics would have worked out better for you if you'd had better luck with Button folding and then better luck with the cards of the flop. (And the result, whatever it was, could hardly have been disastrous for you, but maybe the result was a bit unsettling in that you realize it was not optimal).

Your starting hand is well above average, certainly good enough to raise before the flop. In another situation I might raise before the flop with it. However, in general, I would not raise before the flop with this hand. Instead, I'd want to keep as many opponents as possible in the hand with me.

In some other poker games limping with a hand strong enough to raise would be termed "slow playing." However that is not the best perspective to have when limping before the flop in Omaha-8. Instead, think of limping with this type of starting hand in Omaha-8 as "pulling." (I think that gives it a different, better, perspective).

An interesting love/hate aspect of Omaha-8 is everything can suddenly change. After the flop or after the turn, the fit can be such that this starting hand will need all the protection it can get, or you may want to promote your nut high or low into a scooper. At that point your hand will abruptly metamorphose into a pushing hand.

After the flop this starting hand will probably continue to be a pulling hand. But it may become a pushing hand. Hard to say without knowing the flop.

At any rate, before the flop, this starting hand is definitely a "pulling" hand. Indeed, most good Omaha-8 starting hands are "pulling" hands. And that is an aspect of starting hands regular Texas hold 'em players, even very successful ones, do not seem to understand.

You could be at a table where your opponents are gambling fools and unable to read your cards - and then it would make good sense to raise before the flop, even with a pulling hand.

But although it's hard to judge on the basis of only one hand, that does not seem to be the case here.

You should want to pull as many opponents into the action as possible.

Why is this hand a "pulling" hand, rather than a "pushing" hand? Because this hand will often make the nuts on the river, and even when it doesn't make the nuts, you will often end up with a winning non-nut hand.<ul type="square">• You have a suited ace, the nuts if the board flushes in your suit.
• You have the nut low if the board on the river has three low ranks without aces or deuces.
• If you make a straight it will tend to be the nut straight.
• If the board pairs and you make a full house, it will tend to beat an opponent's full house.
• If the board pairs and you don't make a full house, your trip jacks, trip tens, or trip deuces will beat those of an opponent who also ends up with trips and doesn't have an ace kicker.
• Your two pairs will tend to be better than an opponent's two pairs, if nobody has better than two pairs. (Happens a lot more than some apparently think).[/list]Bottom line: Instead of chasing people out and stealing the blinds, you should want potential customers who will end up holding non-nut hands and who will end up paying you off when you end up with a winner.

[ QUOTE ]
Flop: Standard?

[/ QUOTE ]For a full game, or even for several opponents seeing the flop, you missed a good enough flop fit to continue.

However here you only have one opponent and the flop is high. If you think your one opponent may not have much of a fit either, it makes some sense to take a stab at the pot.

But if you bet because you thought your hand/flop fit is better than your opponent's hand/flop fit, be aware there are lots of ways your opponent could have a better hand/flop fit and in addition, your opponent has position on you. And be aware that your opponent probably will know full well that you realize a good fit with this particular flop is less likely than with various other possible flops and that you might be doing exactly what you seem to be doing - taking a stab at the pot.

At any rate, you bet this flop, your opponent raises, and you're more or less screwed. You don't have much of a flop fit yourself (whether you realize it or not), but you can't tell if your opponent has a better flop fit or not (and you don't know if he realizes it or not). And since now there are 8.75 small bets in the pot and it will only cost you one small bet to see the turn, you call the raise.

You cannot like the way things have gone for you thus far. By raising your flop bet, your opponent may be executing the first step in a "free card" play. That's more of a Texas hold 'em ploy than an Omaha-8 ploy, but sometimes I see it and sometimes I use it myself in Omaha-8 play.
[ QUOTE ]
Turn: I made two pair and decide to call him down.

[/ QUOTE ]You actually should like the turn, but are afraid your opponent raised on the flop because he has a AKYZ, or possibly because he has QJYZ. So you check, planning to call your opponent down.

And then your opponent checks behind you, perhaps successfully executing the second step of a "free card" play. Or maybe Villain is simply playing coy, hoping to get a bet out of you on the river.

After the way you played the first betting round, you end up betting when you don't have a bet and checking when you do. Ironic, isn't it.

Buzz

[/ QUOTE ]


Sums it up imo.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-18-2007, 09:23 AM
Jimbotbs Jimbotbs is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 15
Default Re: [LO8] Two Pair in HU-Pot

Thanks for your responses.

[ QUOTE ]

Bottom line: Instead of chasing people out and stealing the blinds, you should want potential customers who will end up holding non-nut hands and who will end up paying you off when you end up with a winner.


[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I realized that my hand is a pulling-hand. I tried to put pressure on the blinds, but like you said, there are many ways how villain could connect with the flop.


[ QUOTE ]
openlimping the pullings hands and raising the pushing hands makes it easy for villians to read us

[/ QUOTE ]

I think Olrik made a good point here. Of course this is not that important at the low limits.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-18-2007, 10:21 AM
Big Dave D Big Dave D is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,151
Default Re: [LO8] Two Pair in HU-Pot

[ QUOTE ]
i think wining 0.75 BB by just taking the blinds seems to be a good result.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is where you are right and Buzz not playing online lets him down. I have nearly 60k hands and any A2 is also worth about .5BB for me too. So winning the blinds is a good result. Now I would probably limp first in with a lot of A2s, but probably not in the CO or BB and especially against tight players who are likely to pass.

gl

bdd
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-18-2007, 12:06 PM
Buzz Buzz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: L.A.
Posts: 3,633
Default Re: [LO8] Two Pair in HU-Pot

[ QUOTE ]
dont we open up our range in o8 depending on position too?

[/ QUOTE ]Hi Olrik - I don't know about "we." My own range depends on position and some other factors.
[ QUOTE ]
i would argue that with everyone folding to us in late position we need some kind of standard action with any hand we want to play.

[/ QUOTE ]I disagree.[ QUOTE ]
openlimping the pullings hands and raising the pushing hands makes it easy for villians to read us (basicly like only raising with strong AA and A2 hands).

[/ QUOTE ]I suppose that's true if you don't use good sense. [ QUOTE ]
assuming you follow my reasoning we are down to
a) openraising any hand we want to play
b) openlimp any hand we want to play
c) openlimp the pulling hands and fold playable pushing hands

[/ QUOTE ]I follow your reasoning. However, I don't agree with your a, b, c conclusions. More goes into the decision to raise or not than merely whether the hand is a pushing or pulling hand. Sometimes I'll raise with a pulling hand and sometimes I'll limp with a pushing hand.

Rightly or wrongly, how I play a hand depends more on my opponents than on the cards I hold - but both matter. With this hand in this situation, rightly or wrongly, I would usually limp. When I limped, if you figured out what I was doing, of course you'd know I had a hand I wanted to limp with, just as if I raised, you'd know I had a hand I wanted to raise with. In either case, I think most opponents would still have trouble putting me on cards or maybe even on a range.

Buzz
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-18-2007, 12:38 PM
Olrik Olrik is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 90
Default Re: [LO8] Two Pair in HU-Pot

just assume unknown villians hence you have to base your decision wheter to play your hand or not entirely on position/cards. still no standard play?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.