|
|
#13
10-08-2007, 01:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Good spot to b/f river?
I think I'd rather c/c (maybe c/f?) here because an A is much more in your range than it is in his so I don't see how you can ever get called by worse but he seems aggro enough post flop to try to rep the A/6
|
|
#14
10-08-2007, 01:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Good spot to b/f river?
imo it is unlikely, villain will bluff raise this river. as most of his hands have enough showdown value to check behind on the river, i think b/f is good here.
but both lines seem to be very close in value anyway.
|
|
#16
10-08-2007, 01:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Good spot to b/f river?
c/c is terrible here. He check's behind hands that would call a bet, like 54, 43, etc. He's very unlikely to turn any made hands into a bluff. Why would he suddenly rep an ace if he has a hand like that, or some [censored] like TT?
If you check and he bets, his most likely hand is 65, lol.
|
|
#17
10-08-2007, 01:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Good spot to b/f river?
[ QUOTE ]
I think I'd rather c/c (maybe c/f?) here because an A is much more in your range than it is in his so I don't see how you can ever get called by worse but he seems aggro enough post flop to try to rep the A/6 [/ QUOTE ] Why would villain feel the need to rep anything here? The way the hand played out he has something and will just check behind with less than a straight
|
|
#18
10-08-2007, 01:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Good spot to b/f river?
If you say so. In that case, I'd rather c/f. I think betting here is really pointless as I can't see us ever getting called by worse. There are plenty of aces in our range here. In my mind b/f is the worst option available to us vs his likely range.
|
|
#20
10-08-2007, 01:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Good spot to b/f river?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Villain is 20/11/7 over 160 hands. [/ QUOTE ] What hands is he gonna call $32 on the river with that we beat? I wouldn't even consider betting here. [/ QUOTE ] We give him a chance to make a mistake.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
