Right vs. Left = Corporations vs. People?

[canis582]

This is a construct that i've used for quite some time now. Is it valid?

[tomdemaine]

I think you should clear some space on your mantelpiece for the inevitable Nobel prize in economics that's coming your way.

[Thug Bubbles]

[ QUOTE ]
This is a construct that i've used for quite some time now. Is it valid?

[/ QUOTE ]

You should REALLY fill up your OP with some more words and stuff. Right now there's a couple sentences next to an empty bong. What is a corporation if not a grouping of people? Right of what, and Left of what, exactly?

[bluesbassman]

[ QUOTE ]
This is a construct that i've used for quite some time now. Is it valid?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, of course it's valid. In fact, if the corporations could just figure out a way to exterminate all the people, then they'd *really* make big profits.

[TomCollins]

[ QUOTE ]
This is a construct that i've used for quite some time now. Is it valid?

[/ QUOTE ]

No.

[Nonfiction]

I prefer my own "construct," CAPITALISM=BAD, SOCIALISM=GOOD

[AlexM]

If this is the way you define right and left, both the Republicans and Democrats are far right.

[surftheiop]

I seriously wanna shoot myself sometimes. Corporations exist because people LOVE THEM AND WILLINGLY GIVE THEM THEIR MONEY FOR STUFF!!!

[Richard Tanner]

[ QUOTE ]
I seriously wanna shoot myself sometimes. Corporations exist because people LOVE THEM AND WILLINGLY GIVE THEM THEIR MONEY FOR STUFF!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

Kinda a gross over-simplification no?

[ QUOTE ]
people LOVE THEM

[/ QUOTE ]

Some do, some don't

[ QUOTE ]
WILLINGLY GIVE THEM THEIR MONEY

[/ QUOTE ]

Insulin/Eli Lilly example. Sometimes it's willing, sometimes it's a need that isn't being met elsewhere. "Willingly" seems kind of flimsy in this context.

Cody

[surftheiop]

If the need isnt being met else where by another corporation it means that the general people dont have much want for that good or service