|
|
#21
10-23-2007, 09:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: moumouth crushing the $5K HU SnG\'s on Stars
Im pretty sure 4000 sit and gos is enough of a sample size to determine he sucks.
|
|
#22
10-23-2007, 10:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: moumouth crushing the $5K HU SnG\'s on Stars
[ QUOTE ]
I don't use sharkscope but I'm almost certain he's a significant winner against me heads up. [/ QUOTE ] LOL at 4k not being a significant sample size!
|
|
#23
10-23-2007, 10:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: moumouth crushing the $5K HU SnG\'s on Stars
[ QUOTE ]
I've played Moumouth ALOT and he isn't nearly as bad as though stats suggest.. I don't use sharkscope but I'm almost certain he's a significant winner against me heads up. [/ QUOTE ] Oh man, post your sharkscope!
|
|
#24
10-23-2007, 10:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: moumouth crushing the $5K HU SnG\'s on Stars
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I've played Moumouth ALOT and he isn't nearly as bad as though stats suggest.. I don't use sharkscope but I'm almost certain he's a significant winner against me heads up. [/ QUOTE ] Oh man, post your sharkscope! [/ QUOTE ] As I said, I don't use sharkscope. 90% of poker players are losers.. and my best guess is over his lifetime Moumouth will lose less (in proportion to stakes) than the majority of players who have posted here how much he sucks.
|
|
#25
10-23-2007, 10:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: moumouth crushing the $5K HU SnG\'s on Stars
[ QUOTE ]
and my best guess is over his lifetime Moumouth will lose less (in proportion to stakes) than the majority of players who have posted here how much he sucks. [/ QUOTE ] That is true, -11%ROI is bad, but probably still better than the average players. But it just isn't as significant if someone has these stats in $11 s&gs as in $5K s&gs... [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
|
#27
10-23-2007, 11:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: moumouth crushing the $5K HU SnG\'s on Stars
lol ^^
|
|
#28
10-23-2007, 12:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: moumouth crushing the $5K HU SnG\'s on Stars
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] and my best guess is over his lifetime Moumouth will lose less (in proportion to stakes) than the majority of players who have posted here how much he sucks. [/ QUOTE ] That is true, -11%ROI is bad, but probably still better than the average players. But it just isn't as significant if someone has these stats in $11 s&gs as in $5K s&gs... [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] ummm, the average player loses the rake, which is definitely < 11%.
|
|
#29
10-23-2007, 12:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: moumouth crushing the $5K HU SnG\'s on Stars
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I've played Moumouth ALOT and he isn't nearly as bad as though stats suggest.. I don't use sharkscope but I'm almost certain he's a significant winner against me heads up. [/ QUOTE ] Oh man, post your sharkscope! [/ QUOTE ] Im pretty sure The Camels doing ok
|
|
#30
10-23-2007, 01:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: moumouth crushing the $5K HU SnG\'s on Stars
how many people in this thread are winners at $5k HU Sngs?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
