|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Whee two pairs... [censored].
Villain is 25/17/2, is very active on the button, but generally isn't very aggressive. For example:
Pre: Limps UTG, I rase button with AK. Hit an ace and take him to valuetown against his AJ. My image should be lagtard. So on to the hand. Villain is button. I'm bb. My hand 10[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]9:heart Pre He raises to 35. I call. <font color="blue">Could have three bet, but decided to flatcall here as my image was pretty out of line and villain is pretty weak postflop, so I just took a flop. </font> Flop - Pot (75) 1093r I check, he bets 60, I raise to 210, He calls. Turn (495) 3 <font color=" blue">He has about 750 left and I hate all my options</font> His range on the flop seems to me any 10, QJ, overpairs and sets. Is this really a c/f? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Whee two pairs... [censored].
[ QUOTE ]
His range on the flop seems to me any 10, QJ, overpairs and sets. [/ QUOTE ] Board: Td 9c 3s 3h Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 56.303% 55.33% 00.97% 1826 32.00 { Th9h } Hand 1: 43.697% 42.73% 00.97% 1410 32.00 { 99+, 33, ATs, KTs, QTs, QJs, JTs, ATo, KTo, QTo, QJo, JTo } and if you add 78 your 61% <font color="blue">So v-bet</font> |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Whee two pairs... [censored].
I think he will check behind most of the hands that you beat if he's passive. You let yourself get bluffed by QJ but such is life. cf.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Whee two pairs... [censored].
[ QUOTE ]
I think he will check behind most of the hands that you beat if he's passive. You let yourself get bluffed by QJ but such is life. cf. [/ QUOTE ] miss value imo |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Whee two pairs... [censored].
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think he will check behind most of the hands that you beat if he's passive. You let yourself get bluffed by QJ but such is life. cf. [/ QUOTE ] miss value imo [/ QUOTE ] If he checks we can value bet the river. In this situation where our equity is close to 50% and stacks being what they are I would prefer to have villain let us play near-optimally than to go for absolute max value. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Whee two pairs... [censored].
nvm
but i don't see why you would prefer near-optimal over optimal. depsite awkward stack sizes [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Whee two pairs... [censored].
[ QUOTE ]
I think he will check behind most of the hands that you beat if he's passive. You let yourself get bluffed by QJ but such is life. cf. [/ QUOTE ] |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Whee two pairs... [censored].
if hes folding qt and jt then yeah just c/f but if not keep betting like 2/3 pot or something
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Whee two pairs... [censored].
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] His range on the flop seems to me any 10, QJ, overpairs and sets. [/ QUOTE ] Board: Td 9c 3s 3h Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 56.303% 55.33% 00.97% 1826 32.00 { Th9h } Hand 1: 43.697% 42.73% 00.97% 1410 32.00 { 99+, 33, ATs, KTs, QTs, QJs, JTs, ATo, KTo, QTo, QJo, JTo } and if you add 78 your 61% <font color="blue">So v-bet</font> [/ QUOTE ] yeah, but I dont think he's gonna pay me with J10 or Q10 very often. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Whee two pairs... [censored].
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] His range on the flop seems to me any 10, QJ, overpairs and sets. [/ QUOTE ] Board: Td 9c 3s 3h Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 56.303% 55.33% 00.97% 1826 32.00 { Th9h } Hand 1: 43.697% 42.73% 00.97% 1410 32.00 { 99+, 33, ATs, KTs, QTs, QJs, JTs, ATo, KTo, QTo, QJo, JTo } and if you add 78 your 61% <font color="blue">So v-bet</font> [/ QUOTE ] yeah, but I dont think he's gonna pay me with J10 or Q10 very often. [/ QUOTE ] really? even w/ your image and making 33 even less likely for you after the turn? I saw some dude call a shove w/ K high no draw in your video. |
|
|